The British two parties defeat the Brexit Political Maze? No one can break it?

Author: Ye Dehao

British local elections on Thursday (May 2nd) are signal lights performed by British political parties.The Wenshan Conservative Party, who leads the Brexit, has a large loss of about 1,000 300 seats in the nearly 8,000 800 seats. In the context of the traditional advantage of the Wild Party, the Labor Party also performed unprepared., Lost about 60 seats.

The total votes of the Conservative Party and the Labor Party were only 56%, which fell 26%more than 82%of their votes in their 2017 elections.The outside world regards the British people's punishment for the two traditional ruling party.

Wen Cuishan wrote on the Sunday Post on Sunday (5th), saying that she had heard the British willingness to get Brexit and called on the Labor Party to reach an agreement with her as soon as possible to negotiate on the Brexit.

After the local elections, the European Parliament elections came instantly on the 23rd.In addition to the absurd phenomenon caused by the Brexit of Halloween (October 31) this year (October 31), the Conservative Party and Labor Party would also be defeated again.

Although the European Parliament elections have protested with protest votes, according to the YOUGOV polls at the end of last month, the Conservative Party was only supported by 13%, and the Labor Party was only 21%.The European Party has 30%of public opinion support -the gap between this is not to let the two major parties chill.

The successive defeat in the past month has been a major blow to Wen Cuishan and the Labor Party leader Hao Erbin.The only way out is to rush to talk about the Brexit before the election, and rush across the parliament to avoid the doom of the European Parliament election.

The Conservative Party and Labor Party have been negotiating for more than a month on the Brexit, and the two parties will also start a new round of negotiations next Tuesday (7th).Although the details of the negotiations are not officially communiques, everyone also guessed what the major topic of the negotiation was.

The Labor Party is currently different from the official position of the Conservative Party in the three major projects.The first is to stay in the tariff alliance (so that Britain cannot sign a free signing of goods free trade with other countries); the second is closely linked with a single market; third is the protection of labor rights and environment.

These three major projects are related to the future relations between Britain and Europe. Therefore, there is no substantial difference in the legal provisions of the Brexit agreement that the Labor and Conservatives are most controversial and have been rejected by Congress.

Moreover, if you look closely, if you have a good memory, the Labor Party's request with Wen Cuishan's Cheickis scheme about the future relationship of Britain and Europe last year is really a sense of acquaintance.

First of all, Wen Cuishan's Brexit Agreement is the most dirty disease that it may leave Britain in the British and European Tariff League indefinitely, exactly the same as the Labor Party's request.Secondly, the COMMON RULEBOOK has long been in the COMMON RULEBOOK, which is very similar to the Labor's single market.Finally, the terms of labor and environmental protection, whether in the Kicks plan, or the existing Brexit agreement, have already promised.

The two sides have not talked about it, just because everyone is trapped in the political maze and cannot find a way.

In the current situation where Prime Minister Wen Cuishan is not guaranteed, any agreement on the future will not be guaranteed to be rejected by Wen Cuishan's suspected European successor.Therefore, the Labor Party has always asked Wen Cuishan to add stricter and clear sentences to the documents between Britain and Europe as insurance -British politics is called BORIS LOCK, because it is currently in the Conservative PartyIn the suspicion of the European faction, the former Foreign Minister Boris Johnson is most likely to be the Prime Minister.

However, in the British Congress supremacy system, unless there are most members of the Congress, the Boris lock is implemented by the party's delegation and the threat of votes, otherwise these sentences are just empty talks.

Before local elections, the Labor Party also understood this clearly.However, the so -called things do not care about themselves and do not work hard. Of course, it is a good thing to go out of Brexit, but the Brexit is only fruitful, but it is just the fault of the ruling party.

In contrast, the Labor Party, which defeated the local campaign today, may have a little persistence in my heart to solve the problem of Brexit as just as Wen Cuishan said.

However, although the Conservative Party and Labor Party are not very different in the substantive issues of Brexit, it is extremely difficult to find a way out of the two parties that do not cause the two parties to split internal divisions.

At the Conservative Party, if Wen Cuishan is willing to understand the request of accepting the Labor Permanent Tariff Alliance, Graham Brady, chairman of the 1922 Committee of the 1922 Committee, has warned that the relevant behavior will cause the conservative party division.Today, the Conservative Party may amend the party regulations and take the initiative to remove Wen Cuishan's non -trust vote exemption period. Breddy's remarks seem to be the ultimatum of Wen Cuishan.

In the Labor Party, Hao Erbin was threatened by the second referendum in the party and asked him to put on a referendum voting with the Brexit consensus with the Conservative Party.Although the Labor National Election Commission (NEC) continues to support the political route of the Labor -style Brexit plan first, nearly 80 Labor members have once again publicly demanded that Hao Erbin explicitly supports the second referendum.

What's more, according to the Guardian reports, at least 100 members of the parliament have stated that they will oppose the soft Brexit solutions against the closed doors of the two parties.The conservative party opposes any arrangements similar to the tariff -like alliance.After pulling on both sides, even if Wen Cuishan and Hao Erbin can reach a consensus, it is likely that the majority of Congress will not be supported. In the end, Britain will continue to step by place, which will cause severe internal division of the two parties.

At present, the most likely consensus between the Conservative Party and the Labor Party is to pack the Labor Permanent Tariff Alliance through the public relations makeup and packaged the close tariff arrangements for the Conservative Party or acceptable.However, the outside world has long been commonplace, and Wen Hao seems to be trapped in the maze and cannot see any political way.

There must be a way out of Brexit, and one party must be conceded.In terms of affection, the results of the 2016 referendum must be implemented. After all, the referendum is a contract between the government and the people.Therefore, the retaining school that advocates the second referendum should also be sincerely accept their failure in 2016, and instead supports the soft Brexit solution of the two parties.

However, this is not the end of the matter.After Brexit, the referendum results in 2016 have been reached. Of course, Britain can consider gathered public opinion to re -join the EU through referendum.At that time, the second referendum, just as the referendum overturned the results of the 1975 British European Community member referendum in 2016, will be named justified and straightforward.

Leave the Eupai tolerance for a moment, take a step back, maybe the sea can be wide.