Black holes may exist outside 55 million light years, but also appear in the Chinese picture market.
Visual China has become the focus of public opinion because of touching porcelain rights.On April 12, Visual China had voluntarily closed the website for rectification because of the storm; on the same day, the Tianjin Network Information Office established the supervision team to enter its website. In the context of China's overall intellectual property protection environment, vision China has become the target of public criticism. This phenomenon is intriguing.Why does the relevant policy dividend first foster the gray business of visual China?Why do the online market from the extreme of the stolen maps to the extreme, to another extreme that dare not use the picture?
Previously, China's copyright and rights have been difficult to proof and the amount of compensation is too low.In recent years, the state has paid more and more attention to the protection of intellectual property rights. The field of judicial and administrative law enforcement has introduced a lot of preferential policies, and the punitive compensation system is also being introduced.
Especially in 2015, the Supreme People's Court announced the violation of copyright disputes in the Visual China Group and Zhenglin Company as a typical case of copyright claims.Posted the opposite evidence.This is the inversion of the liability for the proof of the visual China cover.The default mechanism reduces the threshold for the protection of the copyright owner, and it also strengthens the obligation to pay attention to the legal source of the use of the picture. It itself reflects the trust of the judicial organs' trust in copyright owners and picture agencies.
But unfortunately, visual China and other institutions have abused judicial trust, and even turned them into porcelain props. Regardless of whether the picture is authorized, first go on its own watermark, stole it, send it online, and wait until some institutions use it.At that time, follow the soldiers, do not make a prompt, and wait until the accumulation of a certain amount, and then propose a high amount of tens of thousands of yuan in claims to force the other party to fight.If it wasn't because it was too much this time, the black hole photos shared by all human beings were stolen as their own, which caused public anger, and the business of touching porcelain would not be pierced.
In the words of netizens: take the copyright work to claim, that is called rights protection; if you take the right of copyright to defend your rights, it is called extortion.Visual China is in today's crisis and is a blame.
However, criticizing the vision of the whole people does not mean that China wants to weaken the protection of intellectual property rights.The picture platform is not useless. It provides a convenient platform for centralized management of copyright, and it also brings benefits to quite a lot of photographers.The business model of evaluating the copyright of the picture cannot be based on the uncomfortable and uncomfortable media of the media, but it must take the law as the criterion.
The problem of visual China is that it focuses on capital advantages, human advantages and legal resources, intercepting China's policy dividends to protect intellectual property rights, abused judicial preferentially, and packed and sold it for shared works that do not belong to their own, and even foreign shared works; in addition, Also engaged in fishing for rights in the picture market. A picture costs tens of thousands of yuan, and the rights have been abused.
When the protection of Chinese intellectual property rights is still in the first division of chaos, the visual Chinese of muddy water have grown into evil dragons.Previously, the default watermark was the right holder, the upside -down liability of the proof, and the high compensation of compensation. It did not really realize the purpose of encouraging innovation. Related judicial policies should be adjusted in time.
This discussion of this time is also a rare opportunity to popularize intellectual property law.The use of pictures is becoming more and more standardized, reflecting the value of labor innovation, which is an inevitable trend; but related policy dividends must benefit the real creators and cannot be intercepted.
