Author: Zhao Guanqi

Recently, a number of production safety accidents broke out in China, and there were explosions in a chemical plant, and the cumulative number of deaths and injuries were hundreds of.In addition to mentioning human casualties and crushing families, the outside world's industrial model is also questioned. It has both the suspects of high -quality development that deviate from the central government in recent years, and the companies involved in violations of regulations.From industrial policy to implement security regulations, the performance of individual places is definitely a serious problem.

At around 9 pm on April 3, at the Taixing Economic Development Zone in Jiangsu, a fire had a fire in the sewage treatment site of a chemical company and caused an explosion.The official report stated that there were no casualties at the scene, and the incident did not affect the surrounding air.

Counting the accident, Jiangsu Province has encountered the third factory explosion in half a month: on March 21, a chemical plant in Xiangshui County exploded, causing 78 people to die, and more than 600 people must be sent to hospital for treatment; 3On the 31st, a metal factory in Kunshan City burst into explosion, causing 7 deaths and 5 injuries.In addition to Jiangsu, in the same period, factories explosions also occurred in Ma'anshan and Qingzhou, Anhui. The former said that there were no casualties, while the latter caused 5 deaths and 3 injuries.

In a short period of time, a series of production safety accidents broke out in various places. Although it seems to be an individual incident, it may actually originate from the same behavior model, and has its system root.Taking Jiangsu Xiangshui explosion accident as an example, Chenjiagang Town, the location of the incident, is only a small town with a population of only 68,000 people.When the certification and standard certification are revoked, it is still publicly produced normally.

Regarding the phenomenon of blatant violations, analysis means that the chemical industry is an important support for the local economy. Even if the corporate violations are serious, the government is still difficult to give up.As for the development of macro -regional industries, the media has already criticized the only GDP theory in northern Jiangsu, blindly developing high -density industries, lacking strict regulatory mechanisms, leading to an increase in unexpected probability.

Compared with the construction of foreign countries and party and government, safety production seems to be technical issues, but the truth is the daily affairs such as safety production, food hygiene, and transportation design. Only can it directly affect the well -being of the people and control the needs of the people's good life.In fact, with the huge results of the 40 years of reform and opening up, the Chinese government has reviewed the only GDP theory in recent years, indicating that there is no trivial matter of people's livelihood, and emphasizing that economic results must be transformed into quality of life and a sense of gain.

In 2017, the report of the 19th National Congress of the Communist Party of China mentioned that it improved the responsibility system for production safety and resolutely curbing major safety accidents.Unfortunately, after two years, a series of serious accidents broke out in Jiangsu, causing many people to lose their lives. In order to seriously investigate the responsibility of this authorities, they should also encourage local governments to seize the opportunity of national economic transformation and seek industrial upgrading paths to avoid tragedy to avoid tragedy.Continuously repeat.