A few days ago, Wu Dunyi, the president of the Kuomintang of Taiwan, threw out the cross -strait peace agreement, which attracted the DPP authorities to amend the regulations on cross -strait people's relations.The Democratic Progressive Party authorities responded to the signing of peace agreements, and heavy artillery attack was a failure of failure, surrender agreement, unified agreement, and war agreement; and proposed that only the preparation of war can get peace. At the same timeIt is a high threshold standard for Congress's review or negotiations before the agreement negotiations, and voting before and after the negotiation, and try to obstruct the cross -strait peace agreement passed in the future by designing a high threshold for design procedurals.
In fact, if the cross -strait authorities want to sign a peace agreement, they must overcome the obstacles of the three mountains. All three parties in the United States, China and Taiwan must be willing to adjust the goals of internal law and related political parties, including the United States' Taiwan relations law and the anti -split state law in mainland China.Security Law and the DPP's referendum Taiwan independence party platform Taiwan's future resolution and normal state resolution.
The first is the amendment to the Taiwan Relations Law. The signing of a peace agreement on both sides of the strait is not just a question of simply cross -strait.Once the signing of a peace agreement on both sides of the Taiwan Strait will lose the legitimacy of the Taiwan relations law in the United States, the mainland authorities will inevitably require the United States to abolish the Taiwan Relations Law.The French Defense Authorized Asian initiative will ensure that law involves the defense part of Taiwan, and it will lose its existence of the legal basis.
The mainland believes that the United States is the biggest challenge for the peaceful and stable relationship between cross -strait Taiwan Straits. Giving Taiwan's necessary defensive weapons will inevitably cause criticism of interference in China's internal affairs. This provoking the mainland to declare US laws that have sovereignty in Taiwan.The people of Taiwan will have a gap in the psychological security support for the US defense. Whether it can be filled with the security psychological psychological psychology brought by the cross -strait peace agreement can be signed.
Secondly, for the mainland, it is necessary to adjust the existing country's strategy to Taiwan and announce that it is necessary to exclude the commitment to solve the Taiwan issue by force.The mainland first needs to amend Article 8 of the Anti -split State Law: Taiwan independence split forces cause the facts of Taiwan to split from China in any name and way, or the occurrence of major incidents that will cause Taiwan to split from China, or peaceful and uniformly uniformly and unified.The possibility is completely lost, and the country must take non -peaceful methods and other necessary measures to defend national sovereignty and territorial integrity.
At the same time, ... not to give up the declaration of solving the Taiwan problem by force, you must change the string more.... The speech on the 40th anniversary of the compatriot of Taiwan claims that it does not promise to abandon the use of force and retains the options that take all necessary measures. They are targeted at external forces interference and very few independent divisions and their split activities.Therefore, to sign a peace agreement on both sides of the strait, the mainland must first abandon non -peaceful ways or force to solve the Taiwan problem.And Taiwan must guarantee that under the premise of unity, it will no longer advocate that any form of independence, or even legal Taiwan independence, that is, the political basis that is laid on the mainland, the uniqueness of Taiwan, and the unity of both sides of the strait.
Finally, the Democratic Progressive Party and related independent political parties must be willing to abandon Taiwan's independence goals.In 1991, the Democratic Progressive Party claimed to establish the Republic of Taiwan with a citizen voting procedure through the referendum. This is a legal Taiwan independence.In 1997, the Taiwan's future resolution advocated that the sovereignty and territory of the Republic of China were restricted in Taiwan and the Golden Horse. This is a kind of division theory thinking. It is different from the mainland's view that the country's unified territory and sovereignty are not split.The normal state resolutions passed in 2007 were requested to make a constitution, change the country name, and participate in the United Nations in the name of Taiwan.
In addition, relevant Taiwan independence parties must also abandon the demands of radical Taiwan independence, including referendum, independence of referendum, referendum, form a constitutional name, and independence of jurisprudence.It is required to recognize the cross -strait peace agreement under the principles of the 92 Consensus of the 92nd Consensus.In particular, the unique group Joy Island Alliance advocates that 2019 is a key year for the independent referendum system. Although the U.S. government has opposed these two claims involving the change of the status quo, it does not mean that the independent faction will not continue to promote it.
In summary, if the DPP or related independent parties have not abandoned Taiwan independence in terms of cross -strait policies, the mainland may have doubts about signing the peace agreement.Treating military revenge on the mainland.There is a contradictory security dilemma on both sides of the strait. If the DPP publicly announces the abandonment of legal independence or facts independence, the mainland must first amend the anti -split national law; and the mainland to amend the law, and it will also affect the United States to amend the Taiwan Relations Law.And Taiwan promises to abandon any form of independence and related independence of radical Taiwan independence political propositions, and must also be restricted and restricted.
In the short term, the DPP requires the DPP to abandon any form of Taiwan independence, and modify the above -mentioned one -party outline and two resolutions, and accept a peace agreement based on the 1992 consensus of the first middle school. It is almost a political impossible task.It is difficult for the formation of internal political consensus in Taiwan alone, let alone the adjustment of the role of Taiwanese characters in the Indo -Pacific strategy of the United States in the United States.If you want to cross the barriers and obstacles of these three mountains, the United States and China must make political concessions in order to complete its work.
(The author is an assistant professor at the Department of Public Affairs of Taiwan Foguang University)
