Wan Yan: Director of governing the country is an old problem with a bureaucratic mechanism. The administrative power is too large, and the director is sweet.The question of governing the country is actually a question of being too arrogant to administrative power.
Recently, the problems brought about by the Director of Governance have been turned out, causing heated discussions.In fact, the so -called director governing the country is a systematic mechanism problem. The root cause of the problem may not be the director. It is a new variant of formalism and bureaucracy.
Director of the Director of Governance from the overflow of power caused by excessive concentration of resources
Director of the Director of the country is an old problem with a bureaucratic mechanism. The administrative power is too large, and the director's sweetness is large.
As early as two decades ago, on March 24, 1998, Premier Zhu Rongji said at the first plenary meeting of the State Council that some departments, where the director was there, the local governor and mayor came to see him. He came to see him.Don't even raise your eyelids.The National Planning Commission has this phenomenon, and the local area has a strong reflection.A little girl sat there, and the local comrades ran to her to report, not only did she not let people sit, but she didn't even lift her eyelids.Turned to lsquo; Director's dictatorship rsquo;
The office is the most basic work unit of the ministries and commissions. The director is the central ministries and commissions, that is, the grass -roots leading cadres. Why can there be such a great prestige?
Power overflowing effects caused by excessive concentration of resources.
Resources are like honey.In the era of planned economy, resources are highly concentrated, and the distribution of power is in the hands of a few people. Everyone can only be linked to honey through these minority channels. Therefore, those who can blend honey in any reason become society.Big coffee.Moreover, the director in it.Imagine that one or several major livelihoods of hundreds of millions of people across the country are completely tied to a certain department. How many directors can one have?Naturally, even the most declining director will inevitably obtain some major power in such magnificent power.
After the planned economy, people can decide whether they have the opportunity to drink honey through the fair competition of market -oriented. The market economy has brought down the decentralization and dissolution of many approval power, but some areas, departments, and localities still have a stronger weight.The color of the plan, the stronger the color of this color, the more obvious the disadvantage of the director's governing the country.The director of some ministries and commissions does not even look at it. According to public information, Kuangxin, former director of the Integrated Department of the Basic Industry Department of the National Development and Reform Commission of the National Development and Reform Commission, is known as one of the top ten most powerful departments in China.EssenceOnce, the deputy governor of a province visited him. He asked the deputy governor to wait outside and played games on the computer before he came out to meet the deputy governor.This scene is similar to what Premier Zhu Rongji said.And these directors will do so because these ministries and commissions are controlled to control great project approval power.
Moreover, these approval rights, due to the excessive concentration and excessive excessive administrative power, lack details and processes, and lack of transparency. Let's not matter if they are supervised. The director is at the mouth of the honey tank.Ying Yanyan and Fly Flying Dogs came to blend, growing up and leased corruption, which produced a lot of small officials and greed, which became an obstacle to the development of socio -economic development.
Director of the Director of the country is the appearance, and behind it is an inaction formalist bureaucracy
The Director of the Director also reflects the problem of poor sense of responsibility and inaction in the bureaucratic mechanism.
Recently, some people say that some policy documents have evaded difficulties because most of the documents are drafted by the director and the chiefs have not adjusted their positions and compromise with each other.
As soon as this statement came out, it caused people to resonate, but after deep thinking, it had to be questioned.
At a executive meeting of the State Council on April 15, 2015, Premier Li Keqiang strictly reprimanded some ministries and localities as not active, and also took documents and procrastinated as shields. At that time, your ministers came to meet. There were no different opinions at the meeting. NowDo you need a few directors to come to lsquo;
It is true.Director of governing the country is the appearance, and behind it is various inaction and responsibility.
The Director's drafting documents are not inappropriate, and the heads of the heads are slightly light.However, the director cannot coordinate the interests and positions of the relevant parties, can their leaders be coordinated?In this situation, the director did not draft documents and did some specific documents. The drafting was expressed by their personal opinions. Shouldn't it be the opinion of the local party committee?
There are differences in different opinions on various departments on some issues. This difference may be due to the differences in understanding, or it may be considered by the interests of the department. It is difficult to coordinate and consistent.Reform will touch the interests of some people, and the reform requires everyone to re -examine the consensus.However, since the director is in a state of coordination, it shows that those who need to be coordinated, lack of consensus, and consider departmental interests are not the director.Who are they?
What's more, no matter how you let them go to do it, the director's plan must be officially introduced, and there are always levels of superior leaders.If the director's governance plan is large and unlicensed, and it is light, how can it be able to pass the level smoothly with the leaders of the local party committee?
Reform is of course difficult and twisted.However, it is precisely because of the difficulty and twists and turns that the reform of ministries and commissions at all levels and local agencies need to transform the central government's reform policies into specific rules and programs with detailed and detailed rules.If the functional department cannot mention a meaningful and operable solution, what is the meaning of the functional department?This is not a deep -rooted formalism.Director of the district, but was usually regarded as a clerk, but he took out the responsible person at a critical moment. Isn't it the careful opportunity of the higher -level leaders who should be responsible?Some people are unwilling to join the reform consensus based on the interests of the headquarters, and block the heads of the heads on the front line.
Director of Director of the country is a kind of self -proud arrogance
The Director of the Director also reflects the arrogance in the bureaucratic mechanism. Without a sense of service, the director did not study the motivation of the expert to respect the expert. As long as the position is high, it will sooner or later it is an expert.
In fact, the so -called director governing the country is the market's unreasonable questioning of administrative mechanism arrangements. The reason why people question the Director of governing the country because often the relevant departments have held their economic killings to win the 10 -year development power, but their qualifications are still shallow, but their qualifications are still shallow, but their qualifications are still shallow.There is not enough knowledge and a little understanding of the actual situation. These directors are neither industry experts and non -academic experts, but they are on all experts, pointing to Jiangshan and directing the market.Such the director of the country often takes out some policies of the air tower. At the actual operation level, people are crying, laughing, and improving, but in detail management, it is difficult to make the specific operation level difficult, and it cannot be advanced.
However, does the root cause only originate from the director?
The question of governing the country is actually a question of being too arrogant to administrative power.
At present, leading cadres occupy the name of the expert at the same time.In fact, many positions really need professional and technical talents to be competent, but now the opposite is the opposite. As long as the position is high enough, it can be called professional and technical talents.There is not a rotating door between the school, the think tank, and the industry, but the one shoulder.This is not only conducive to the selection of talents and talent training. On the contrary, this is another manifestation of resources that are too concentrated and excessive administrative power. It has also created more arrogant civil servants.
Even if it was originally a professional and technical personnel in the industry and academic circles, when I turned around and engaged in official positions, I should understand that different industries and work have different responsibilities, different audiences, and different methods. Policy formulation is also a learning.It is impossible to put your energy into professional research, and you should not have a lot of them. On the one hand, you should point the market and face the market and point.Ask, as a decision maker, it has a huge influence on the market. What does it affect the market as a scholar?As a scholar, you should ask questions about the problems in the market. The decision makers themselves are the heads of these questions. Who should ask who to answer?
What's more, no matter whether the industry experts were originally or not, they should be more hard -working and humbly after becoming managers.Teaching, brainstorming.The central government advocates strengthening the construction of think tanks to give full play to the majors, technology and wisdom of more people.Now some officials are manipulating through power, and they are the experts who are the biggest positions. Maybe who can listen to it?It can only become increasingly unprepared and grow.
The Director of the Director is not appropriate, but after the promotion of the director?Is it impressive from making people cry and laughing?Is it just a promotion distance between the director and the expert?
When we criticized the Director of the Director, what did the director think?Isn't they clear and clear, looking at the lesson of the front car, as a teacher of the funeral?
Postscript
It is said that grassroots cadres are difficult to be, and the director is in the central ministries, that is, a grass -roots cadre.Why is it difficult for grassroots cadres?Because the higher -level leaders have a strong sense of their official position, the market awareness is too weak, and the service awareness is too poor; the departmental interest is too strong, the overall situation is too poor, and the reform of reform is too poor.
The market said that the director of governing the country is criticism, a joke, and helpless, but the manager said that the director governed the country. He did not know what the mentality was expressed. I hope that it is not to shake the pot, not to understand the confusion, or pretend to be helpless.
According to the root cause of the Director of Director, the manager did not realize that he was providing public services and public management, and did not realize that he was serving the market. Instead, he always led himself to the market and isolate from the market.It is a strange state of public power as a private right and a governance ability as your ability.
Since the 18th National Congress of the Communist Party of China, the four winds have achieved significant results. However, the most difficult to cure the four winds is to oppose formalism and bureaucracy. It has repeatedly banned, and even invisible mutations and pattern renovation.Compared with two or thirty years ago, the phenomenon of the Director of the country has changed a lot, but it still exists in many departments and places.
Facing the key historical stage of climbing and overlapping, from the central to the local area, it is even urgent to release the vitality and motivation of the market, which requires the administrative system to break away from formalist bureaucracy.
The central government has repeatedly proposed that marketization and rule of law must be fundamentally reversed, so that the director and other leaders are in their positions, and structural reforms must first start with these leaders.
Someone asked, will the director govern the country, will the director mistaken?
If the director really can rule the country, then the others will be meaningless.If the director is not really able to govern the country, other people will lose their responsibilities.Therefore, as the Prime Minister asked, the director can really mistake everyone?
If the director governs the country, you can rest, you must rest.
