(Morning News) The joint investigation team of the storm of the trillions of Shaanxi ’s 100 billion mineral rights case announced the results of the investigation yesterday. The so -called dossier was lost by the Supreme People's Court.Scholars of the interviewees said that the results of the investigation were persuasive, but the incident had affected the credibility of judicial judicialness. It is estimated that when the National People's Congress held a meeting next month, the opposition votes of the Supreme Law Work Report may be more than last year.

Officially, Shaanxi Yulin Kichlai Energy Investment Co., Ltd. sued Xi'an Geological Mineral Explanation and Development Institute for cooperation and development contract disputes.Xinhua News Agency reported yesterday that the joint investigation team of the Central Commission for Discipline Inspection, the Supreme People's Procuratorate, and the Ministry of Public Security participated in the joint investigation team of the Central Commission for Discipline Inspection.And stealing cases.

His dissatisfaction includes: in 2014, he was disciplined to hold a training course in the name of a Supreme Court's directly under the name of a Supreme Court and a private division of the profit.The archives were commanded and not recommended; on the evening of November 25, 2016, the president was asked to draft the legal documents of the second instance of the Cage Case in the case of overtime, otherwise the work would be handed over to others.

Wang Linqing's purpose of stealing the dossier was to create trouble for the unit, so that the organizer of the new collegiate panel could not successfully carry out follow -up work, and eventually forced the unit to continue to serve as the organizer.

The survey showed that Wang Linqing came to the office at 23 pm on the 25th and brought all the positive and some sub -roll materials home.On the 28th, he lied to the president that the case was lost and was notified to withdraw from the collegial panel the next day.

After the Cage case was sentenced in January 2018, Wang Linqing met with the parties Zhao Faqi many times, and was introduced to Cui Yongyuan by Zhao Faqi around August.Cui Yongyuan helped Wang Linqing records the video of the so -called Cage Case Paper and the black screen of the surveillance video. These videos were later released online.Cui Yongyuan's sub -roll materials released on the Internet also originated from Wang Linqing.

The joint investigation team determined that the nature of the Cage case contract should be a cooperative exploration, not the transfer of the restriction right.The investigation team also determined that the final judgment of the Supreme Court was correct and inappropriate.Wang Linqing was suspected of illegal acquisition and deliberately leaked the clues of the state secret crime to the public security organs for investigation.

The Supreme Court's second instance judgment and retrial conclusions on the dispute over Shanxi Wang Jianang and Wang Yongan were also identified as the correct entity by the joint investigation team, but there were flaws in the identification and calculation of operating profits.

The survey also found that Yan Changlin, the former deputy bureau of the Supreme Court Supervision Bureau, was suspected of accepting the parties to ask for the case and asked the case through greeting and other methods, but there was no problem with Wang Linqing.Yan Changlin had been transferred to the disciplinary inspection and supervision organs for the case of violations of laws and disciplines and violations of laws and disciplines.

Zhu Jingwen, a professor at the School of Law of Renmin University of China, said in an interview with Lianhe Zaobao that the results of the investigation were logical. The whole thing was mainly Wang Linqing's own problem, and it did not involve the dismissal of the Supreme Academy leader.

He said: Previously, the outside world speculated whether the director of the Supreme Court would be overturned. I thought it was impossible at the time because it would cause explosiveness of the credibility of Chinese justice.During the Cultural Revolution, even the Deputy Prime Minister was knocked down, but the director of the Supreme Court was not passive.

However, he also pointed out that Wang Linqing and Cui Yongyuan's impression of the problem of the Supreme Court caused a great response, showing that the public had not trusted the credibility of judicial judicialness, and the court had many places to improve.

He believes that although the investigation team found that the problem was mainly in Wang Linqing, it also exposed the problem of improper management of the Supreme Court of Porcelain, and the problem of not being complete when promoted.He said: Wang Linqing's teacher told me that he was a smart high student.Such a person was eliminated when the court's implementation of the reduction of the amount of staff will naturally have the idea of retaliation of the society.In terms of resolving this contradiction, the court has many jobs to do.

Zhu Jingwen predicted that when the National People's Congress reviewed the work report of the Supreme Council next month, the votes in voting would be more than last year.

As for Cui Yongyuan's responsibility, Zhu Jingwen believes that there is not much information about Cui Yongyuan's disclosure. It can be inferred that he must bear some responsibilities, but because he is just a communicationman, he is not a fake party, the law will distinguish it.(Reported by Beijing Special Commissioner You Runtian)