Han Yonghong: By Block Huaweis upgrade, the United States frequently comes out

Is the US voice warning that Huawei threats is true, or is it just imagined?(Reuters)

Early North to read

The first week of the Chinese New Year, Chinese Vice Premier Liu He flew to Washington on January 28 to make key efforts to resolve the Sino -US trade war.He welcomed him that the US Department of Justice announced that he would sue Huawei, two subsidiaries and chief financial officer Meng Wanzhou with 23 criminal crimes.

After the trade consultation that was concerned about the world, both China and the United States released positive information on the progress of the negotiations. US President Trump also announced that he would have in the short term.Consultation.These positive signals have stimulated the expectations of the outside world for the peaceful end of the trade war, but the United States blocked China Huawei without any softness, but intensified.

It was also before and after the US Department of Justice sued Huawei with 23 criminal crimes. US State Council officials traveled to the capital of European countries such as Germany and France, and met with the European Commission and NATO national officials.In addition.There are unknown U.S. officials and told Bloomberg that if the allies ignore a warning, the United States may take action to respond.

The people of the academic community have long pointed out that behind the Sino -US trade war is the scientific and technological war. In the specific topic of 5G network construction, the essence of the quasi -army war between the two sides is even more at a glance.The significance of 5G is far more than the increase in network speed. 5G plus artificial intelligence will form the backbone of modern life and global trade, connecting various smart cities in the world, and the control network can also change, copy data or change the user without knowing it.Data transmission route.If it is expressed in dramatic language, it is the world to get 5G.

The United States has always worried that China has inserted the back door in the 5G network, stealing foreign information and conducting network attacks.However, the United States cannot get evidence to prove this, which makes people question that the United States is not as good as people in the 5G field, and the means of sacrificing non -market to suppress Huawei. The so -called network security is just an excuse.

Is the US voice warning that Huawei threats is true, or is it just imagined?The New York Times recently proposed a new red panic, throwing this problem.The report quoted U.S. officials that it is wrong to find the back door in the equipment and software manufactured by Chinese enterprises. It is also wrong to find the connection between specific executives and the Chinese government.Disappearing, the Chinese government can require enterprises to meet the needs of national information work, which is the key.

In the meaning, the United States does not need to put forward evidence. As long as it proves that Chinese companies can be used by the country to steal information, it is a sufficient reason to block Huawei.This logic seems a bit strong, but considering the extreme importance of national information security, the United States has doubts without any reason, although its means are not discussing.

From this perspective, the few levels contained in the Sino -US friction in the past year are very clear: the first floor is a serious imbalance in trade; followed by the dispute between scientific and technological warfare and rules, which contains the big country competition, and China has accused of stealing the United States in the United StatesIntellectual property rights, incompetence rules and unfair competition disputes.The development of the dangerous direction of Sino -US economic and trade frictions into the New Cold War is the root cause of the United States' institutional doubts about China.Critics in the United States believe that large Chinese enterprises like Huawei cannot be regarded as private enterprises at all, but the extension of national interests. It is said that China has embarked on the road of national capitalism in political words.

Scholars who sympathize with China do not agree with this term. Although most of them also agree that the Chinese country's intervention in the economy is indeed increasing, which is related to the style of the leader, but it is more related to the actual growth of China's national energy and long -term historical laws.In fact, as early as 2006, China proposed a large -scale industrial revitalization plan from the national level; the perspective of political history shows that since ancient times, China has three layers of capital structure at the same time:National capital, the bottom layer of folk free capital, and the middle layer of the country and the folk boundaries.

The above -mentioned pattern of the Chinese -based market (the State) is the theme of Zheng Yongnian, director of the East Asia Research Institute of Singapore, the latest book.Professor Zheng himself has also said on different occasions that China cannot follow the Western path, and China is more and more like itself.

This China, which is more and more like its own, is in a fierce collision with the world's number one country.It is undeniable that the domestic three -storey capital of China has undergone imbalances, and private capital is facing marginalization. This is a place to balance.Internationally, the United States, which dominated for many years, saw the return of the East country with huge energy and a large amount of state -owned economic ingredients in ancient times, and its doubts can be imagined.Moreover, respect for intellectual property rights, transparent decision -making procedures, and rule of law have long become the general mainstream value of the world. If China wants to expand its influence more smoothly, it is necessary to increase their whip in these aspects.

Right now, the suspension period of the Sino -US trade war is only three weeks, and it is generally believed that the possibility of overtime negotiations is the greatest.However, even if the trade war stopped slightly, the contradiction between China and the West will not change fundamentally.The next vane of the Sino -US competition focuses on the fate of Huawei's mdash; MDASH; whether the United States can win enough allies to pull up the new technology iron curtain, and the result will write the world pattern.