The first consensus of China and the United States leads the trade negotiations in the

The Sino -US economic and trade consultation ended in Washington on the 31st. The position of the two parties was substantially approaches, and the situation of each other's moving towards each other was further formed.The two sides discussed the issues from trade balance, technological transfer, intellectual property protection to implementation mechanisms, and concerns of China, and achieved staged progress.The two sides also clarified the timetable and roadmap of the next consultation.When the term of the negotiations ended on March 1 was one month left, this consultation increased the motivation of the two countries towards the best results, and also provided more reasons for the market to optimize.

President Trump met with Vice Premier Liu He on the 31st and sent a number of Twitter, which also released positive information.Trump also said that he was looking forward to ... the chairman met again in the near future.

If you do n’t know each other, after more than 10 months of tricks, it seems that the two parties have a deeper understanding of each other and new cognition different from the past.How to get along with the world's largest economy and the second largest economy, control differences, and solve problems. The two sides gradually find new paths along the general direction of the consensus between the two heads of state.

The nature of Sino -US trade negotiations is actually the consensus reached at the G20 summit of Argentina on December 1, last December 1st last year. Otherwise, there are too many problems. Maybe the two parties may talk further and more, and the more contradictions will talk more and more.Now that things are on a relatively smooth track, the leadership of the heads of state of the two countries play a decisive role.

In fact, China and the United States have actually solved a lot of differences, especially in China to increase imports from the United States to reduce trade imbalances.There are still difficulties that need to be overcome, but the huge benefits of these difficulties compared to the United States to reach the agreement will be proper. It has become increasingly uncomfortable in the direction of China and the United States in the direction of ending the trade war.

The basic nature of trade determines that the result of negotiations around it must be a win -win situation. This is actually clear that both sides of China and the United States are clear.At the technical level of the negotiations between the two parties, there will be tit -for -tat, but its results must have room for mutual benefit and win -win.

This is the most intuitive when China and the United States break through trade.Increasing trade balance involves the major and reasonable interests of the United States, and it is also beneficial to expanding the needs of the Chinese people to meet the Chinese people's demand for a better life. Therefore, the two parties have to do two enthusiastic coordination and docking.

The United States requires China to carry out structural reforms, and the situation is relatively complicated, but logic is also similar.China is determined to deepen reform and opening up, and some of the requirements and desires of the United States are consistent with the interests of China. They can be compatible with each other.Wait, objectively speaking, these reforms should have done it, and use China -US negotiations to promote these reforms, which is harmless to us.

When the structural reform of China is deeper and deeper, the core interests of China will get closer and closer to the core interests of China, and the major interests of the United States are getting farther and farther. They may touch fundamental issues such as Chinese social systems and national security.At this time, the negotiation situation is bound to be affected by the core of the two sides or the far -distance interest of the two parties, and finally decide the way of soft landing in this problem.This also contains the logic of win -win.

Economic and trade relations have long played the cockpit stones of Sino -US relations, and also played a role in promoting their respective economic development.China has been proven to be in line with the development path of its national conditions. The orderlyness and autonomy of Sino -US trade and China to maintain reform have never been contradictory.China has made persistence on issues involving core interests. This is in line with the basic laws of international relations. I believe that China and the United States can eventually reach a tacit understanding around these major principles.

More and more people have optimistic expectations for Sino -US trade consultations. The reason is that no matter what position they are, they can realize the situation at the moment of Sino -US consultation, and I believe that the two parties will eventually face face -to -face, rather than willfulness.

Indeed, China and the United States cannot solve all differences, but the consensus between the heads of state of the two countries provides the final political and strategic thrust that surpasses those differences.In general, the two countries are now much smaller than that at the initial upgrade of trade conflicts ten months ago, even two months ago, and their desire to reach an agreement between the two parties is also growing.

After this negotiation, there was no reason for China and the United States because of a specific stumbling.The US senior negotiating delegation will soon go to Beijing to continue negotiation with China to eliminate unresolved differences.The most important thing is that the two teams continue to go forward along the direction pointed out by the consensus between the two countries, and obey ... the timetable for the President and President Trump to eliminate various interference.In that case, China and the United States will provide a new interpretation of a economic and trade perspective for defining the relationship between the 21st century.