On October 30, U.S. President Trump once again said amazing in an interview with the media: he will sign an administrative order, overthrow the long -term citizenship of the United States, and completely abolish the landing nationals.
This remark was tantamount to casting a blockbuster bomb in the circles of public opinion across the United States and the world, which caused a variety of responses.
The most puzzling thing is that in the face of the clear definition of citizenship in the fourteen amendments to the Federal Constitution, Trump is not clear about his paper administrative order will be difficult to do because of the so -called unconstitutional charges.Intersection
Objectively speaking, although it sounds quite extreme, the abolition of the landing nationality has long been in the US conservative camp, far from Trump's sudden imagination.
In the interpretation of immigration policy in the 2018 Guoqing Counseling, the Trump administration publicly opposed the so -called chain immigrants, that is, a chain reaction based on relative relationships. In the end, a U.S. nationality may burst into a family immigrant into the United States.And this thorough violation of the concept of relative immigration in the 1965 immigration and nationality law cannot curb the diversified development trend of the American population.
As a result, the focus of all issues turned to the 14th Amendment to the Federal Constitution that approved in 1868, that is, the rigid regulations of the United States that were born in the United States.
If this regulation is completely abolished, not only the so -called anchoring babies that attract chain -type family immigrants in the conservative mouth can be unplugged, but they can also at least maintain the advantages of the most currently occupying the majority of white people as much as possible.
In this sense, Trump's strange theory is a large market in conservatives, but the past Republican politicians may not dare to scream publicly.
Nowadays, Trump has broken the opportunity and has said the conservative political opinions that the conservatives have been in their hearts for a long time and dare not say. This expression of true temperament will obviously consolidate the basic disk of the Republican Party in the mid -term elections.
However, from the objective reality of the political process, if Trump really signs this administrative order, he will immediately encounter a constitutional prosecution, and then enter the judicial procedure in an all -round way, and such a highly controversial issue is easily to the Federal Supreme Court.Although after Cavano's position, the Federal Supreme Court has completely ensured the political trends of conservatives occupying an advantage, it is not easy to fully subvert the administrative order of the Federal Constitution amendment to be supported.
And this may be what Trump wants to see: after losing the House of Representatives of Congress and entering the lame state, Trump can completely use the dispute between citizenship of birth as a wedge issue to firmly control the conservatives, especially white peopleVoters, even launched a national political movement on modification and even overthrowing Article 14 of the Federal Constitution, and then added weight to their 2020 election agenda.
In other words, Trump said this time: What he really wants is actually the leading political agenda, and the abolition of citizenship of citizenship is not the first goal.
It is undeniable that even if these conservatives can eventually unplug the so -called anchor baby, but the legal population of U.S. citizenship is still inevitably facing the prospects of the population structure of no majority of ethnic groups.In this sense, any politicians, whether the Democratic Party or the Republican Party, should now do how to build a country and policy system that is more in line with the diversified structure, rather than meaningless to reverse the trend.
