Ji Yan Spring and Autumn
On February 5th, the CPC Central Committee Disciplinary Inspection Commission investigated and dealt with three middle management cadres in one breath.Just a month since this year, the Central Commission for Discipline Inspection has won six central management cadres, indicating that the CCP will continue to fight "tiger".
Central management cadres refer to cadres who have filed in the Central Organization Department. Most of them are senior officials at or above the deputy ministerial level. The right of appointment and removal is in the Central Committee of the Communist Party of China.
The three middle management cadres who have fallen in the Lantern Festival are Hao Hongjun, chairman of the Dalian CPPCC, Liaoning Province, Yi Pengfei, vice chairman of the Hunan Provincial Political Consultative Conference, and Jiao Xiaoping, deputy commander of the Xinjiang Production and Construction Corps.The Central Commission for Discipline Inspection announced that the three were suspected of serious disciplinary violations and were undergoing discipline review and supervision investigation by the Central Commission for Discipline Inspection.
Public information shows that Hao Hongjun is 60 years old and has worked in the political and legal system for a long time.The deputy secretary of the Discipline Inspection Commission of Liaoning Province, etc., served as the chairman of the Dalian CPPCC last year.
Yi Pengfei is also 60 years old this year. He was the deputy director of the Hunan Provincial Planning Commission, deputy director of the Provincial Development and Reform Commission, Mayor of Huaihua City, Mayor of Loudi City, Secretary of the Chenzhou Municipal Party Committee.Chairman and Secretary of the Chenzhou Municipal Party Committee, will no longer be the secretary of the Chenzhou Municipal Party Committee since March 2021.
Jiao Xiaoping is 57 years old. He was the deputy director and director of the government of the Ministry of Finance and the Social Capital Cooperation Center. In June 2022, he served as a member of the Standing Committee and Deputy Commander of the Party Committee of the Xinjiang Production and Construction Corps.
This year, the Central Commission for Discipline Inspection has announced the investigation and punishment of six middle management cadres.On January 6, the official website of the Central Commission for Discipline Inspection reported that the chairman of the Qingdao CPPCC of Shandong Province, Ji Binchang, Deputy Director of the National Tobacco Monopoly Bureau, He Zehua, and Wang Xuefeng, former deputy director of the Standing Committee of the Hebei Provincial People's Congress, received discipline review and supervision investigation by the Central Commission for Discipline Inspection.
Four of the six central management cadres were won by the CPPCC and the "second -line posts" of the CPPCC and the People's Congress.Based on past experience, these people have often served as the leaders of the first -line real power department. After being transferred to the second -tier position, the past black materials are more likely to be reported, and they are more likely to be caught by the disciplinary inspection department and become the performance of the "tiger" of the Central Discipline Inspection Commission.
For example, Chen Ruui, deputy director of the Standing Committee of the Guangdong Provincial People's Congress, who was checked in June last year, was the secretary of the Guangzhou Municipal Legal Committee of the Communist Party of China, Secretary of Zhongshan Municipal Party Committee, and Shenzhen Mayor;The bottom line is full of anger with the illegal merchants, engaged in politics and business, and collect money behind the scenes. "Sheng Guangzu, the former director of the General Administration of Customs and former Minister of the Ministry of Railways, was five years after retirement. The Central Commission for Discipline Inspection had found "eating customs by customs" and "relying on railways to eat railways" last year.Huge property.
Therefore, in recent years, many senior officials who have transferred to the second and second -tier or even retirement are not equal to the landing of peace. Once the resources and relations of the relationship between the real power and the relationship of the relationship, the second -tier positions are like waiting to be slaughtered.When will it fall.
Senior officials on the second -line positions have been dismissed, mostly because they committed the "leadership" of actual power, especially the party and government, which reflected the difficulty of the official supervision of the "first leader" from the side.
On the one hand, the official needs a sufficient authority to maintain the operation of the system, allowing the "first leader" to integrate personnel, financial power, and property rights.On the other hand, the "first -hander" power is too large and there is a risk of transforming into a "one hand".
In an environment that lacks effective supervision, the "one hand" big affairs "one grasping", decision -making "one words", "one pen" in financial spending money, "one sentence" for people to choose from, causing "superior supervision to superviseToo far away, too soft supervision at the same level, and lower -level supervision are too difficult. "
In order to solve the "first -hand" supervision problem, the official has not worked hard in recent years, but the effect is not significant.
For example, party and government agencies at all levels have established a system of democratic life conference systems, the personal income declaration and major matters of leading cadres, please instruct a series of leading cadres supervision systems such as the reporting system and financial supervision system.The "first -hander" promotes the execution, and most of the "first leaders" may not be limited to their own power.
At the same time, the social circle, living circle, and activity circle outside the "first -hand" work are complex and concealed. It is easy to be hunted by the management objects, and it is also difficult to effectively supervise.In addition, the "one hand" directly or indirectly help relatives and friends to make profit through business activities, and it is difficult to supervise.Judging from the investigation and punishment of the Corruption Commission for Corruption, the phenomenon of "corruption couple shops" and "bribery father and son soldiers" are common, and it is difficult to be discovered and investigated when the "first leader" is in office.
In June 2021, the official announcement of the Central Committee of the Communist Party of China on strengthening the supervision of the "first leader" and the supervision of the leadership team, emphasizing the supervision of the "first leader" as the top priority, creating an atmosphere of the "first leader" that feels the supervision at all times.Essence
Opinions also stipulate the responsibilities of the Political Bureau of the Communist Party of China to urge, educate, and remind the relevant local and departments, as well as the Central Commission for Discipline Inspection and the Central Organization Department to urge the provincial party committee to strengthen the responsibilities of the "first leader" management of subordinates and require superiors to higher levels.The inspection report on subordinates will be listed separately to discover problems and form a deterrent.
It should be said that the inspection system has played a positive role in investigating and deterring corruption officials and the "leadership" corruption.This is because the inspection team can be suffered or disturbed by the inspector and discovered the clues of corruption of officials.
But inspections are definitely not universal.Many officials who have served as the "first leader" of the party and government were investigated and punished after retreating to the second line, which shows that they often pass safely in the first -tier posts.How to more effectively supervise the "leadership" of the party and the government for corruption and bribery and abuse of power will still be the long -term challenges of the CCP's comprehensive and strict governance of the party.