There is a problem of ＂overdue operation＂ in Changsha Telecom Building fire equipme

China Telecom Building in Changsha, Hunan Friday (September 16)Fire in the afternoon .According to reports, the building notified the fire and maintenance projects earlier this month, and has mentioned the issue of "overdue operation of fire equipment".

Hunan Telecom issued a notice saying that China Telecom Hunan Company Lotus Garden Telecom Building caught fire at about 3:30 pm on the same day. The specific reason for the fire was investigating, and no casualties were found.

According to the Daily Economic News report, Zhongtong Service Chain Management Co., Ltd. Hunan Branch (hereinafter referred to as Hunan Zhongtong Service) electronic bidding platform shows that China Telecom Hunan Branch used toIn 2022, the second long-distance telecommunications hub building fire and maintenance project of the Lotus Garden Courtyard-fire alarm and smoke anti-discharge system for bidding.The main evaluation product category involved in the bidding is CP01685 automatic alarm system.

Data show that Zhongtong Service Supply Chain Management is a subsidiary of China Telecom Group's supply chain management services.

The bidding announcement mentioned that the Lotus Garden Building is composed of the hub and east -west affiliated buildings. There are 41 floors on the hub floor, with two underground floors and belonging to super high -rise buildings.At present, the fire equipment of the Lotus Garden Building has overdue operation, some equipment settings do not comply with the current national standards and specifications, and there are still large hidden safety hazards in the fire alarm system and smoke anti -exhaust system.The estimated total amount of the project is 4.409 million yuan (including tax, RMB, about S $ 888,000).

However, Hunan Zhongtong Service Electronic Tendering Platform issued an announcement on September 5 that the above bidding failed.The deadline for the bid is said to be 9:30 on September 1 (Beijing time).After the review, the project was less than 3 effective bidding and lacking competition, and the bidding failed.