The Five Eye Alliance has accused China of ＂theft＂ intellectual property threats to

The head of the Five Eyes Alliance Intelligence Gathering Get a publicly accusing China of theft of intellectual property rights, and using artificial intelligence (AI) to conduct hacking and espionage activities on countries.

Reuters reports that senior officials from the United States, Britain, Canada, Australia and New Zealand issued the above joint statements after meeting with private companies on Tuesday (October 17) after meeting with private companies on Tuesday (October 17).

Christeve Lei, director of the FBI (FBI), said that the joint statement of "unprecedented" was issued in response to China's "unprecedented threat" for global innovation.

Five -eye alliance officials said that from quantum technology, robotics, biotechnology to AI, the secrets in various fields are Chinese stealing objects.

Christopher Lei said: "China has long been locking in corporate goals through technology networks such as integrating network invasion, human intelligence operations, and seemingly harmless enterprise investment and transactions.And danger. "

Liu Pengyu, a spokesman for the Chinese Embassy in Washington, responded that China is committed to intellectual property protection.Liu Pengyu said in a statement issued to Reuters: "We resolutely oppose the accusations and discreditation of China's unseenary allegations, and hope that the relevant parties will treat the development of China objectively and fairly."

The United States has always accused China of theft of intellectual property rights, which is a big pain point for US -China relations.However, members of the Five Eye Alliance have publicly condemned China's theft of intellectual property rights for the first time.

Bergis, the director of the Australian Security and Intelligence Organization (ASIO), said: "The Chinese government is conducting the largest and most complicated intellectual property and professional knowledge theft in human history."

Bergis said that China ’s intention to innovate for its own national interests is“ indispensable and exactly appropriate ”, but“ the behavior we discuss here far exceeds the traditional spy activity scope ”.