Chinese official media Xinhua News Agency on Saturday (June 3) published a comment article saying that the United States verbally replaced the "decoupling theory" with "de -risk", but the action continued to put together "de -China" "Containment puzzle ".This method of splitting the world in the name of "risk" brings huge risks to the global economy that deeply blends.
The article pointed out that the concept of "de -risk" in the United States is thinking about thinking and conclusions that the international community is thinking in the direction it wants.The United States convened an international conference to repeatedly promote the containment of Chinese issues under the "de -risk" framework.The spontaneous state of "de -risk" and "de -Chineseization" is turned to the United States to achieve the overall "decoupling" of China to curb strategic assistance.
The article quotes the magazine of the US Foreign Affairs Magazine, pointing out that the concept of "de -risk" in the United States is actually limiting China from three aspects: restricting China's ability in the strategic field of national security; restricting China in China; restricting ChinaThe status of key raw materials and processing; restricting the impact of the Chinese market around the world.
The article pointed out that in the final analysis, the core of the "de -risk" is to create a "small courtyard wall" for China, to engage in a more refined "discouragement", which is intended to exclude China and maintain the United States in the United States in the United States in the United States.The central and monopoly position in the world economic system, "risk" is false, and maintaining hegemony is true.
The article also said that it is called "de -risk", which is actually "de -China", and even "globalization".The formation and development of the global industrial chain supply chain is the result of the common role of market laws and corporate behavior. In order to restrict China's development, the development of economic and trade issues is politicized, coerced to seduce some countries to restrict exports to China to impact the stability of the global supply chain.
The article believes that the United States is not able to promote "de -Chineseization" in the name of "de -risk".For enterprises, the United States wants to manually change the mutually beneficial market pattern of Chinese and American companies such as against the water. After all, companies are the most important market entities. Enterprises are pursuing profits and will not completely violate the laws of the market in accordance with the government's command. For consumers, leave "China in China"Manufacturing" means higher prices and higher inflation rates; for all countries including allies and European countries, this not only does not meet its interests, but also pays high opportunities.
The article said that the current economic connection between China and other countries in the world is so close, and the cost of "decoupling" or "risk" with the Chinese economy actually far exceeds the expectations and affordability of some countries.For more than 40 years of reform and opening up, China has accumulated huge advantages in infrastructure, market size, talent reserves and industrial clusters. It has formed a powerful "magnetic field effect" for global commercial forces.Will hedge the US hegemony strategy against China.
