Source: Taiwan Zhongshi News Network

Author: Su Yonglin

Taiwan Cai Yingwen passed the Los Angeles, USA, and met with McCarthon and 18 members of the US House of Representatives. The row was not small, but some details showed mystery.In fact, Cai Yingwen and McCarthy are endorsing for the policy of the United States, and they have also become two thread puppets under the consensus of the United States and China under the consensus of the United States and China.

First of all, "McCarthy's feet".The "Cai Maihui" scene of "bright eyes", in addition to the special plane of Liden, is the pair of brown leather shoes and green cotton socks of McCarthy.If you look closely at the costumes of other members of the meeting, you can find that they are similar to McCarthy, belonging to the "business leisure" suit.In other words, the US Congress and Members deliberately announced through clothing: This is not a "formal, official, diplomatic" meeting, but an informal meeting.Just as Tsai Ing -wen gave a speech at the New York think tank, the invitation letter was dwarfed into a "guest".Your Mightiness".

The second is "Tsai Ing -wen's mouth".Tsai Ing -wen's speeches around Taiwan's international situation in almost all diplomacy and public places must mention the three major points: one is that cross -strait is not affiliated with each other.Second, mainland China is targeted at Taiwan.The third is the expansion of authoritarianism.However, these three sentences were gone when they met with McCarthy after meeting with McCarthy, and even the "country" and "Republic of China" were difficult to open up.If the Democratic Progressive Party said, Cai Mai will be the "unprecedented" highlights of nearly 200 international media participating, how can Cai Yingwen only explain the relationship between the United States and the "Taiwanese"?

It is not difficult to see that the script of Cai Yingwen's meeting with McCarthy seems to have written one by one when the crisis communication between the US and middle -level high -levels.Before Cai Yingwen's visit, foreign media disclosed that Wang Yi, director of the mainland government's foreign affairs office, secretly talked secretly with the US Guoan consultant Su Liwen. I believe that in that communication, the Chinese "draw lines" in the United States and the Chinese direction of the United States.Later, the first stop of Cai Yingwen's transit was treated with a low -key process, and the second stop of transit California was activated in the established architecture.

Similarly, Beijing subsequently issued a statement by the four agencies to protest, announced on the 5th to announce the implementation of special operations in the central and northern parts of the Taiwan Strait, and sanctions on the 7th"Later, land can predict and control countermeasures.

After the Mainland Army was changed, the maritime police basically had naval equipment and actual combat capabilities, but still belonged to the government sequence.For example, in recent years, the mainland has been normally escorted on the Diaoyu Islands with maritime police to avoid rising Sino -Japanese friction to a sensitive military level.As a result, the Taiwan Strait's cruise of the Taiwan Straits of the mainland announced the political meaning of "Taiwan belongs to China", but it has not increased to the sensitive level of military blockade and even the preview of "Wu Tong".

Similarly, Beijing's sanctions on Xiao Meiqin are only symbolic. They are no longer suspended from the import of goods in Taiwan again as last year, as quarantine and other reasons.Political considerations.

On the day of the Cai Maihui, Xi Jinping, President of Mainland China, was meeting with French and EU leaders in Beijing. The focus should be the Ukrainian mediation. Foreign Minister Qin Gang also held three talks with Saudi Arabia and Iranian foreign ministers.This detail reflects that Beijing's "count in the heart" for Cai Mai will be "in the heart".It can basically determine that Cai Mai's impact on US -China relations is even smaller than balloon storm.

(the author is a think tank researcher)