Since the rise of Tiktok in the United States, American politicians have always wanted to give it a crime in order to localize or shut down it.Probably because they saw the rise of China from it and tried to invade the United States with their world view and values.However, this charges cannot be established legal.This is as if the police have been staring at a arrogant criminal gang, but hate the evidence of arrests and sued it based on legal terms.Finally, American politicians found a direction to convict it, which is the legal terms of "national security" that explained vaguely.But Tiktok, as a business -like entity, is willing to persecute a country.
Of course, Tiktok, which the author is talking about today, is not about the national security of the United States at all, nor does it matter about the competition between China and the United States, but to the general public.
First of all, what is the advanced algorithm of TIKTOK?
From the perspective of the audience, the so -called advanced algorithm is to use multiple parameters to analyze user preferences, preferences or needs, and then make content priority for users.To grab and retain users.
From a business level, this must be right, reasonable and legal.However, from the moral level, there are some problems.You know, the so -called investment of people is actually not dialectical to people, including material and spiritual.A short video platform to invest in people is naturally a spiritual spirit.
Why is it wrong to say that investing people?Because constantly investing in people, it will make a person form a single worldview and values and make people cognitive narrowly.This is very simple to explain.When a person is unhappy, he will have disgusting a certain object. At this time, he needs mental support, that is, he needs to invest in what it is.If you make a corresponding sales at this time, it coincides with its needs and it is easy to succeed.But this will make people have a cognitive cognition of food or water, and it will enlarge and long -term emotions of his disgust, so that people will become cognitive and narrow.
Good and evil is the opposite of our brain, forming a moral tension together, so that we have dialectical thoughts, knowing that it is necessary to think about it and avoid evil.Therefore, both should face up to the trade -offs of our cognition and behavior, and should not be good, but good.
But now, the Internet has become a medium for people to observe and understand the world.For many people, the content of the Internet world is the presentation of the real world.It even replaced the brain to help us cognate this world.
Sure enough, people know that there are true or false in the Internet, and right.But whether it can distinguish between true and false depends on the carrier of information.If it is text or cartoon, because of its unrealistic sense, it will make us easily cause skepticism and easily distinguish the authenticity of the content.If it is a video, because of the real sense, many times it will make people think that the content is true without thinking.Because of the impulse to show off, it will be more oriented to think that the content you see is true.As a result, fake videos are difficult to distinguish.
As for right, it is difficult to distinguish.Most of the time, people's discerning with non -non -wrong depends on their own nausea.Followed by interest.
Therefore, the content of the user's preferences is in essence, which is essentially to allow users to accept a single worldview and values for a long time.Its seriousness is that in the long run, it may make people lose dialectical ability, and to distort the world outlook and values.This is definitely harmful to society.The disagreeable cognition either makes people lonely and helpless in the real world, or it becomes paranoid and full of anger.This is like washing people in the small black room, and then released, the consequences can be imagined.The real world needs to be open and tolerant, as is the online world.
The author is a Chinese pictograph and ancient philosophy researcher
