The well -known Chinese blog Jinghai Hou published an article in its WeChat public account on July 9 what kind of Hong Kong we need.Until this week, there are also senior media people and scholars in Hong Kong to comment on the article.
In the end, what kind of Hong Kong we need to point out at the beginning that at the third anniversary of the implementation of the Hong Kong National Security Law, Hong Kong once again had a voice emerging: to maintain the uniqueness of Hong Kong.
And there will be such a voice. Jing Haihou believes that in addition to unnecessary associations, it is also because Hong Kong has made a word and deeds that the executive should not be made by the implementation of the National Security Law and the Patriot Governance in Hong Kong for three years.
Examples of the article include: a few people (including officials and members) do not ask about the nature and severity of the matter, and use the National Security Law to do things.The brain shifted pressure on the society and implemented the government's decision with hard mechanical mechanics in the way of low -level red and high -level blacks., From time to time, the hat of the hat appears hell; hellip;
Jinghai Hou summarized such words and deeds as not to ask for no merit, but he had nothing to do;
For the uniqueness of Hong Kong, the article summarizes four measures: whether there is guarantee and continuity for individual freedom; whether it does not shrink and thoroughly open to the outside world; whether there are channels and smoothness in political expression;, More.
The article ended like this: lsquo; keep Hong Kong's unique rsquo;, that is, people who can love her here, those who leave for a time are willing to come back.Do not toss afterwards.
Systems Da Ming Dajie
As soon as Jinghai Hou's article came out, in the Hong Kong political and critics, it was like a thunderbolt, and the crew people responded voicely, including heavyweight characters.
For example, Zhang Zhigang, the president of the one -country and two system research centers and the members of the Chinese CPPCC National Committee, said that Hong Kong should not deliberately seek differences to show the two systems, but it should not be excessively promoted to promote one country.
The Hong Kong Government and Beijing officials in Hong Kong attended the flag -raising ceremony of the 26th anniversary celebration of the Hong Kong Return in Golden Bauhinia Square, Wan Chai.(AFP)
The convener of the Hong Kong Executive Council, Ye Liu Shuyi, Member of the Legislative Council, and Tang Jiayi, a member of the guild, mentioned that the officials of the Education Bureau in May this year said that Lu Xun's works encouraged students to go to the streets and demanded that the school library was removed.The incidents of the books were also removed from the shelves. They criticized the Hong Kong government to distinguish between literature and institutional text, and made citizens unnecessary worry, so that foreign investors had a bad look for Hong Kong.
The two elected committees Jiang Yuhuan and Xie Weijun. The former questioned whether the Hong Kong government was necessary to mention the National Security Law at all times.Relieve social atmosphere.
Sing Tao Daily also quoted unknown politicians pointed out that Beijing's zero -zero policy pursued by the crown disease had been regarded by individual politicians in Hong Kong as the imperial decree, and even members even stated that they advocated coexistence with crown disease to violate the National Security Law.Some members do not name criticism. In the speech of government press releases and individual officials, the colorful words have increased, and they believe that such words of mind should be used as little as possible.
However, it should be noted that although the above -mentioned sectors are rarely made up for the phenomena of the country's rule of law in the past three years, they are actually careful when they speak or post, and criticize the Hong Kong government and Hong Kong officials.Boom in the United States to promote lsquo; go to two -systemized RSQUO; also has the situation of pan -Guoanhua (so that China attaches more importance to Guoan), and it means that Hong Kong is now transitioning, so it is too intense to perform excessively.
Who is Jinghai Hou?
Jinghai Hou is a WeChat public account that has been paying attention to the social topic of Hong Kong for a long time. It is said that the author is a reporter from the Chinese Central Media in Hong Kong, but his real identity has become a mystery so far.
The amount of reading on WeChat is not much, usually there are only a few thousand people, just like what kind of Hong Kong we need in Hong Kong, as of Wednesday (July 19), the number of readingsThere are only more than a hundred, not a big V with a reading of 100,000 +.
However, Jinghai Hou has a column on the Dagong Wen Po report, thinking about Hong Kong and other official media, thinking about Hong Kong and other official media, and his WeChat public account articles have been reproduced repeatedly.Taking the new day of Hong Kong on December 19, which was published on December 18 last year, more than 3,000 words in the full text, the Dagong Pao used the half -version of the length to reprint.
Jinghai Hou claims to comment on mainland China and Hong Kong's current politics with a flat character. Do n’t discredit Hong Kong for that traffic on February 11 this year.The phenomenon of mainland tourists pointed out that the problems of impolite treatment in Hong Kong in Hong Kong may not be because of Mandarin. Even before the anti -repair storm in 2019, the global smile index of that year showed that among 29 countries and regions,Hong Kong ranks fourth with 56 points, far lower than the global average score of 80 points.In other words, the unreasonableness of some service staff in Hong Kong is not necessarily targeted at mainland tourists, nor does it exist in all people.
Jinghaihou's article has attracted the attention of Hong Kong's public opinion. He has criticized the Hong Kong Government's policies and members' performance from time to time in recent years. For example, the banner he wrote in January 2021 obviously opposed the construction of Hong Kong cities in the Mainland, and he bombarded the Hong Kong -made school's ability to discuss politics.What kind of Hong Kong does we need to write this time? The main theme is still fully affirming the route of Beijing, but severely criticized the construction of the establishment.
Has someone behind the scenes?
Regarding the response caused by the Jinghaihou article in the Hong Kong school, some comments believe that some people are behind the scenes, which means that the article represents the official position of the central government to some extent.But this statement cannot be certified.
Some scholars believe that the article is only the point of view of some people in the political elites of the mainland. It represents the call of the mainland pigeon faction and rational party.The interests of falling in the face of various challenges in the face of the economy are affected.
Chen Jingxiang, a senior media person in Hong Kong on Wednesday (July 19), wrote the phenomenon of Jinghai Hou in Ming Pao that the response caused by Jinghaihou's article in the formulation camp is more reflecting the current political ecology and atmosphere of Hong Kong: Panmin, Panmin,The opposition disappeared. The political and social elites of the patriotic camp had doubts about the policy of governing the Hong Kong, but they did not dare to declare it. They felt that Jinghaihou's article should have a special background.The circles of circles, hoping that the article will endorse them.
However, he pessimistic predicted that the Hong Kong government and Hong Kong officials' Ningzuo should continue, and it is difficult to correct it, because the right is wrong, the left is just the problem, the route cannot be wrong, and the political consequences will be serious.This kind of political culture originated from mainland China has now been integrated into Hong Kong, including the view of viewing the background of the background of the Patriotic Media and Jinghaihou.
Below Chen Jingxiang's article, there is also a statement of Ming Pao added: If the current affairs article published on this website will be criticized, it aims to point out that there are errors or measures in the relevant system, policies or measuresThe disadvantage is that the purpose is to promote or eliminate these errors or disadvantages, and improve it according to legal channels. It will never intend to incite others to hate, dissatisfied, or hostile to the government or other communities.
This may also be the two sides of the phenomenon of Jinghai Hou Hong Kong.