Lin Wenhan, a permanent judge of the Hong Kong Court of Final Appeal, said in an event on Tuesday (July 11) that Hong Kong's "embrace diversity" allows both parties to have autonomy to choose the controversial solution that is best for themselves to ensure their legal laws to ensure their laws.right.
According to Sing Tao Daily, the Hong Kong Lawyers' Association's "Centennial Change Bureau Hong Kong Business Opportunities" forum invited the former chief of the Department of Law Zheng Ruohuan, a senior barrister, a senior barrister from Yuan Guoqiang, and Lin Wenhan, permanent judge of the Final Audit Court to explain Hong Kong.Why is international business arbitration and international mediation preferred place.
Judge Lin Wenhan said that Hong Kong's "embracing diversity" allows both parties to have autonomy to choose the controversial solution that suits them best to protect their legal rights.He explained that when the two parties signed the contract, the provisions had agreed. They had autonomy to decide which arbitration office resolved business disputes and fully respect their decisions and willingness.Moreover, arbitration can continue to be carried out simultaneously during the proceedings to consider other effective solutions to avoid lengthy litigation waste of time, money and energy.
Lin Wenhan said that the beauty of the mediation is the supervision and assistance of the two parties in the process of supervision and assistance to the advantages and disadvantages of different mediation options.Discussion, find out the best solution, and have no harm to both parties.
He also mentioned that the regional court introduced "assistance reconciliation" during the management process in 2018 to promote the use of alternative disputes in the use of alternatives in civil lawsuits.Judicial agencies have always encouraged all parties to resolve disputes. At present, they are actively considering the test plan for civil case reconciliation conferences to promote the high courts that need to handle more civil lawsuits.
Zheng Ruohuan, a senior chairman of the Asian International Law Research Institute, said on the same occasion that arbitration as a solution for alternative litigation disputes in the same occasion.Commercial disputes can adopt third -party funding arbitration, provide ways to seek justice, and can also be used to alleviate the problem of cash flow.The investment agreement signed by Hong Kong under the CEPA framework has promoted and protected investment between Hong Kong and the mainland.Due to the implementation of the arbitration decision between Lu and Hong Kong, the parties to the arbitration procedure can apply for temporary measures in Hong Kong as a tool for righteousness, showing that the judicial mutual assistance arrangements of Lu and Hong Kong have made Hong Kong better in Singapore in this regard.
Yuan Guoqiang, a senior chairman of the Hong Kong Division and co -chairman of the Hong Kong International Arbitration Center, said that Hong Kong has traditional judicial proceedings, independent judicial institutions, and arbitration and mediation dispute solutions services, and even moreThe Apologies encourage reconciliation with the lawsuit.Hong Kong's arbitration and mediation services are very mature, with strong legislative framework support, transparent fees, ensuring fairness and fairness, and ensuring cost -effectiveness. It is better than other jurisdictions without arbitration laws.The mediation emphasizes that "with peace as expensive" can also promote harmony. Before the transaction and contract of the two parties, the two parties should choose a plan and place to resolve the dispute early, causing "prevention than treatment."
