In response to the report of US members earlier, they called on Huafu to sanction the Judge of the Hong Kong National Security Law.
According to the Singao Daily Daily, the Singao Daily report, a spokesperson for the Chinese Ministry of Foreign Affairs in Hong Kong, saying that the Hong Kong National Security Law and the Hong Kong National Security Law and the Hong Kong National Security Law and the Executive Official China Commission (CECC)The judicial system of the SARs clamored for unreasonable sanctions on the Judge of the Hong Kong National Security Law, expressed strong condemnation and resolute opposition.
A spokesman said that Hong Kong judicial institutions, judges and judicial personnel are independent and uninterrupted to exercise judicial power. They are the cornerstone of the global rule of law society and a business card for the rule of law in Hong Kong.The Hong Kong National Security Law "one legal incense river" allows Hong Kong to return to Haiyanheqing. The justice of the rule of law has been stretched. The various rights enjoyed by the vast number of Hong Kong residents to be better guaranteed.Hong Kong's judicial organs and judges in accordance with legal regulations, in accordance with statutory powers, follow the statutory procedures, handle their cases and independent cases, dedicated their duties, and they are righteous.
CECC published a city named a city on Thursday (11th) local time: a report on the role of Hong Kong judges under the national security law, and urged the US government to sanction 29 Hong Kong National Security Law designated judgesEssenceThe report pointed out that the opaque process of the selection of judges in the Hong Kong National Security Law also promoted the system illegal acts of the Hong Kong Government's right to ignore the rights of juries and innocent preferentially under the National Security Law under the National Security Law.
In this regard, a spokesman for the Hong Kong Government said that under the Hong Kong National Security Law, the Chief Executive entered into the list of designated judges involving national security cases, and the schedule, handling of the case, and which one approved which one is assigned to the caseOr which judge is responsible for dealing with the case, it has always belonged to the judicial function of the independent exercise of judicial agencies.The Hong Kong National Security Law on designating judges has never harmed the fairness of the judge, or the Hong Kong Special Administrative Region Court exercised independent trials when he tried the case.
The spokesman also said that the settlement of jury during the interrogation is not an indispensable element in criminal crimes in fair trials.Judicial justice.When dealing with the case, whether the case involves national security, it has always been a judicial position independently and fairly without any intervention.
The spokesman pointed out that the Court of Final Appeal has clearly stated that the Hong Kong National Security Law also emphasizes protection and respect for human rights and adheres to the value of rule of law while maintaining national security.And the behavior and activities that endanger national security can cause very serious consequences. The Hong Kong National Security Law has added a strict bail threshold to the national security case and has not denied the legal principles of innocence. In factPublished bail.