Why do netizens particularly dislike the content of suspected showing off?Because in this completely self -explosive focus event, the shadow of power behind showing off is never revealed.Including this "we have someone" in order to encourage patients to survive, and its spiritual core also reveals distinctive power worship and obscenity of privileges.
Short review
"Use all civil servants to donate blood". A few days ago, a woman was seriously injured in a car accident during a short video platform during a short video platform. In order to treat her, her husband and family had gone through and even used the place of incident to "all civil servants donate blood."After the relevant statements have aroused heated discussion among netizens, the woman's husband came forward to denial the relevant statement, and "I hope netizens can treat them rationally."
Difficulties are not dead, of course, it is worthy of being fortunate, but there is also an old saying, called "the disaster comes out of the mouth."
Regardless of the original intention of the women's editor or release of short videos, it is good to encourage themselves to "live well", and to hold the pipa to show off, objectively, it does cause public opinion onlookers.According to the women's family, the various statements of the so -called "our family" were made to encourage them to survive. However, the problem is that in the case of the parties, they have improved significantly.When the music was sent to the Internet, the family did not make a timely clarification of the "good faith lies" in the early stage. This is probably the main reason why the families related to the families involved were onlookers and hotly discussed.
Speaking of which, the various rumors of the "rumor" of the news are actually not in line with the cause and effect logic of this case."Use all civil servants to donate blood" and other sayings have been passed on. From beginning to end, it is not a "network transmission", but the graphic "self -described" made by the parties.It is not even excluded to present evidence for this, but this is not a "false" that can let everyone disperse.
Why do netizens particularly dislike the content of suspected showing off?Because in this completely self -explosive focus event, the shadow of power behind showing off is never revealed.Including this "we have someone" in order to encourage patients to survive, and its spiritual core also reveals distinctive power worship and obscenity of privileges.At least in some kind of subconscious of the families involved, labeling images such as "we have people" and "use all civil servants to donate blood", which also belongs to content that can cheer for patients and bring spiritual pleasure.
What's more, not all the topics that have caused hot discussions on the Internet must be that ordinary netizens are watching pictures and far -fetched, and there are some brainless showing off for various purposes.The subsequent clarification of all news can be pushed to the "network biography". After using a sentence "false" to good, right or wrong. Since it is so clear, the other party must have a sincere apology.
Of course, the relevant statements and explanations currently presented need to be further verified.For example, the mysterious aunt who was used as a gimmick to comfort the patient, although the relatives of the parties denied it as a public office, but at that time, the relative who could be said as a gimmick, why could it be carefully compiled in this set of claims in this set of arguments.The logic is self -consistent, not to make people feel abrupt
After "using all civil servants to donate blood", after attracting attention, the staff of the relevant departments of Ali region said in an interview with the media that the blood donation was a voluntary behavior of the local cadres and the masses, which came according to the process without special circumstances.Regardless of the purpose of the initial "goodwill lie" involved, because of its inappropriate statement and practices, it brings huge harm to all parties in the incident and causes a considerable degree of misleading to the public.What the parties need to do now are based on the clarification, and apologize to the behavior of wasting public opinion resources and distinguishing the emotions of netizens, instead of appealing to netizens to "look rationally" as if they do not matter.