On Wednesday (October 12) of the UN General Assembly, the results of overwhelming voting were used to condemn Russia's resolution to annex the four districts of Eastern Ukraine.Although the votes continued to discard the votes in this vote, when the Chinese Deputy Deputy Representative of the United Nations spoke at the Society of the United Nations, the recent conflict with the recent Russian ground conflict was intensifying.Essence

Some interviewed scholars interpreted that China ’s abandonment votes in this time are actually equal to opposing the actions of Russia's annexation of the four districts of Eastern Ukraine.Some scholars have evaluated that when many cities in Ukraine were violently bombed by the Russian army this week, Geng Shuang's speech was more to listen to Russia, and also expressed concerns about the use of nuclear weapons to use nuclear weapons to cause the war out of control.

The UN General Assembly condemned Russia's resolution to perform a referendum in Russia in Ukraine's occupation areas, including 35 countries such as China and India abstained.

Geng Shuang said at the meeting that China was deeply concerned about recent ground conflicts, and it was deeply sorry for civilian casualties and civilian facilities caused by it.He believes that the priority is to guide the parties to maintain restraint, avoid continued upgrading of conflicts, prevent confrontation from getting out of control, and promote the situation to relax the situation.

Geng Shuang also pointed out that in the final analysis, the Ukraine crisis must be resolved peacefully; no matter how difficult the difficulties are, the door of political solution cannot be closed, the process of diplomatic negotiations cannot be stagnated, and the efforts of the war to talk about the war cannot be relaxed.

Scholars: Chinese abandoned votes are secretly opposed to Russia

Li Mingjiang, an associate professor at the Lajilinan International Research Institute of Nanyang University of Technology in Singapore, evaluated in an interview with Lianhe Morning Post that China cannot accept and support it, and even recognize Russia's annexations reason."This abstinence is obviously indicating that it (China) is actually not supported, and then secretly opposes (Russia)."

Wu Xinbo, Executive Deputy Dean of the International Institute of International Issues of Fudan University, analyzed in an interview that Geng Shuang's speech still expresses China's consistent position in Russia and Ukraine's conflict, that is, it does not support the contradiction between the two countries by war means;China also believes that the West behind Russia and Ukraine and even Ukraine must maintain restraint to avoid war upgrades.

But Wu Xinbo evaluated: "From the moment, (Geng Shuang's appeal) may have a little more weight to Russia." He analyzed that this not only increased its counterattack against Ukraine this week, but also causedChina is worried about the outbreak of nuclear wars in the local area and will be out of control to the war.

Geng Shuang also emphasized on Wednesday that holding the Cold War thinking, implementing the political, manufacturing camp confrontation, and the pursuit of absolute security can only lead to conflict.He believes that it is irresponsible dangerous behavior that highlights ideological differences, coerces other countries to choose a team, create isolated targets, and promote the decoustal chain.

Scholars of interviewees believe that Geng Shuang's speech also expresses China's position against NATO's eastward expansion. It has obviously supports Russia and criticized NATO. At the same time, it also indirectly revealed that China does not want Ukraine to join NATO's attitude.

Although Geng Shuang reiterated on Wednesday that China will continue to play a constructive role in promoting the ease of the situation and the political solution of the crisis, but Li Mingjiang and Wu Xinbo have evaluated that with the current willingness to negotiate, it is difficult for China to play more effective.Merge the role.

Li Mingjiang expects: "The current situation is almost not allowed to do anything practical. Therefore, it is very likely (in the future) to continue this verbal persuasion for a long time."