Thailand's advanced party sought for the establishment of a joint government, but the party leader to serve as the Prime Minister must also pass five levels and six generals.
Wanwichit Boonprong, a professor of political science at the University of Landshi, said on Monday (May 15th) to interview with Lianhe Morning Post that the biggest obstacle to the Tower is the House of Lose House because of the 2017 constitution.Candidates for the Prime Minister must get more than half of the 750 seats in the upper and lower houses, that is, 376 support votes.
250 members of the House of Lose House are appointed by the military.The Bangkok Post on Sunday (14th) quoted the House of Representatives in the House Councilor that the House of Representatives had their own views and standards when choosing the Prime Minister."The voting orientation of the House of Lords may not be the same as the voters. If the House of Lord must elected the Prime Minister with most of the House members, then there is no need to go to the house."
Wanweiqi believes that the advanced party may use social media and public opinion to put pressure on the House of House, and ask them to support the party leader of the House of the largest political parties under the results of the election as the Prime Minister.
Pravit Rojanaphruk, a senior media person in Thailand, analyzed this newspaper that if the advanced party does not rely on the house, the Thai pride party that controls 71 seats may be the key to the pagoda.
However, the advanced party and the Thai party against the Thai party oppose the guilization of marijuana without guilt. If you want to cooperate with the Thai proud party that pushes cannabis without guilt, you may have to seek compromise in this policy.
If the pagoda cannot be allowed or caused a large -scale demonstration or military coup
Bavavi said that the Thai pride may refuse to join the Political Alliance, which led to the road of the Pattapaida."If the pagoda does not serve as the Prime Minister, it may cause a large -scale street protest, conflict with the outbreak of the opposition, and then may occur."
Wanweiqi also said that if members of the House of Commons disclosed their rights when they voted, so that the pagoda could not get the required 376 votes, Thailand may fall into a political crisis.
In addition, the pagoda also faces the allegations that violate the election law.
The Citizenship Party complained to the Thai Election Commission last week, saying that the Tower held the ITV equity of the Broadcasting Corporation and asked the Election Commission to cancel his qualifications.The Thai Election Law prohibits candidates from holding a media company shares when registering for candidates.
The Tower denied the allegations, saying that he was the executor of his father's will, so he turned to his name.He had submitted information to the National Anti -Corruption Commission in 2019.
If the pagoda is convicted, in addition to the qualifications of the members of the parliament, he may also be banned from participating in policies.
Bavavi therefore said: "Putta has become the next Prime Minister of Thailand.
Different parties of the party's offensive monarchy's position must be compromised
Ahead of the Party Organization and Government also face the difficulty of compromising how to compromise with potential allies with controversial policies.
The former editor -in -chief of the Bangkok Post, Vera Prateepchaikul, pointed out that the front party is different from the Thai party's stance on the offending monarchy.Adhere to the practice of the law, the prospects of the cooperation between the two parties may be affected.
When the Thai party leader held a press conference on Monday that when he was willing to join the government with the advanced party, he pointed out that if the party's candidate candidate, he pointed out that if the party insisted on abolishing the law of the offending monarch, it may hinder the two parties hindering the two parties.Alliance.
However, at least twice before the pagoda selection, it publicly clarified that it would not seek to abolish this law, but advocated the practice of the law.
