The Institute of Cross-Strait Urban Planning of Xiamen University issued a document earlier this month (August 5), and proposed that " Start the preparation of Taiwan's pick-up as soon as possible ".It was removed shortly after the article was published, but it has attracted the attention of Taiwan and Hong Kong media.On the WeChat platform, this article still survives.At the beginning of the article, compare Taiwan and Hong Kong and connect to the external environment.Increase, the timetable for unifying Taiwan may be advanced at any time.According to the article, the turbulence of Hong Kong over the past few years shows that if the transfer of regimes has not made a good plan, it will bring very serious consequences to the smooth transfer of future social order. Therefore, it is imminent to fully take over Taiwan's plan after unification.The article proposes two "as soon as possible": the Central Taiwan Working Committee is established as soon as possible, as a "shadow government" to receive the opposite regime at any time.Establish a Taiwan governance pilot zone as soon as possible.The article believes that the Central Taiwan Working Committee can spread the real sense of Taiwan's return to all strata inside Taiwan, so that the people of Taiwan can feel that the opposite shore is prepared for the actual regime.The article recommends that the Taiwan elites and institutions are allowed to participate in the design of the Taiwan receiving plan as much as possible, so that the Taiwan society feels that the political regime transfer plan is designed by them and forms a mainstream social consensus.The article also said that the turmoil in Hong Kong shows that one country, two systems are not necessarily suitable for Taiwan. In the beginning, Taiwan must be completely integrated into the mainland.Therefore, it is recommended to establish the Taiwan governance pilot zone as soon as possible. The location can be selected in Xiang'an District and Quanzhou Nan'an City, Xiamen, which borders Golden Gate, and introduced retired military education staff to assist the formulation of policy details.The article summarizes: "Unity is the beginning, governance is the standard for testing whether the unity is successful."After the cross -strait reunification, how to deal proper status and governance issues in Taiwan must have already started researching, but it is estimated that due to the sensitivity and timing of the content, it is rarely discussed publicly.I do not know why the above article was released at this time, but was immediately withdrawn.The article is written like an academic papers. Whether it can withstand the real test is a question mark.Even some of Taiwan's public opinion questioned that the author's motivation was to "get funds with the central government".The term "takeover" is adopted in the article, which contains the meaning of forcibly accepting the management of Taiwan, but it is also said that the "Taiwan society feels that the regime transfer plan is designed by them."This "fake democracy" operation method, Taiwan, who has blossomed in democratic elections, must be seen by people and how to form a social consensus?What surprises people is not surprising that the article suggested that the pilot zone in Xiamen and Quanzhou has introduced the retired military education staff to assist in formulating the policy details of taking over, saying that this is the largest transition period to shorten the risk of switching the regime.
Some Taiwanese soldiers ran to mainland China after retiring, and some were accused of spy by the Taiwan government.In November last year, Taiwan sued ten active and retired soldiers , saying that they were engaged in espionage for the mainland.The article recommends that the retired military education staff must be appreciated from reality to the existence of operational space, but it will undoubtedExtermination of the internal division of Taiwan.The most important article is the end: "Governance is the standard for testing whether the unity is successful."It is close to Taiwan's reality, but the most politically incorrect sentence is: "Hong Kong's recent turbulence shows that the practice of one country, two systems, and completely accepting the existing system is not necessarily suitable for Taiwan."Beijing still adheres to the political policy of one country, two systems to achieve the unity of cross -strait.Minister of the Communist Party of China Shitaifeng Tuesday (August 20) "Global Overseas Chinese Promoting China Peace and UnityThe conference emphasized that one country, two systems will play an important role in achieving the unity of cross -strait.What is most concerned about the outside world is that this article on the Cross -Strait Urban Planning Research Institute of Xiamen and Greater Strait represents Beijing's policy trends on Taiwan?Is there a deep meaning behind the exposure of the article?Testing wind?Or is it just a normal release, which caused a negative reaction to be removed from the shelves?According to the public information, the Institute of Urban Planning of the Xiamen and Greater Strait was established in 2009 and is named under the School of Architecture and Civil Engineering of Xiamen University.Tang Yonghong, a professor at the Taiwan University of Taiwan, said in an interview with the Taiwan United Daily News that the Institute of Urban Planning of the Cross -Strait Cross -Strait of the Xiamen University is mainly engaged in the relevant research work of urban planning, not a unit in the Taiwan research system.He also said that the mainland folks include diversified opinions of academic circles, and related articles reflect the views of some people in the mainland, but they may not represent the government's official direction of Taiwan's policy, nor will they be released by the so -called "acquiescence".The official cross -strait officials have not responded to tacit understanding so far.However, on Facebook, a lot of Taiwanese netizens pressed the "haha" expression in the relevant posts.Many people disagree with the so -called "fully taking over Taiwan", and even laughed at the dream on the other side.There are only sporadic posts on the mainland Weibo to leave messages and netizens. Many people agree that "it should have been prepared."The official silence and the folk waves show that the official cross -strait officials have not yet made a good preparation for public discussion, let alone the preparation of "takeover" after the unity.EssenceHowever, occasionally the so -called "taking over Taiwan" plan arouses discussions. It is not bad. In addition to preparing for the day of possible arrival, it also provides people with a clue of deployment as a "takeover" to be "take -up".
