The theory of the Nobel Prize in Economics this year is not only a positive theory that scholars have obtained in the study and fields, but also a lesson of blood on the world.

The topic of winning the Nobel Prize in Economics in 2024 is the correlation between the social system to the rich and the poor of the country.This is a topic that more and more scholars and ordinary people are thinking, and are also controversial.Three scholars in the United States Daron Acemoglu, Simon Johnson, and James A. Robinson almost overturned the geography and climateDetermine the statement of the rich and the poor.This assertion influences many people in later generations, and even Li Guangyao said that the air conditioner is the greatest invention. There is also the shadow of this thinking: hot climate causes people to be lazy, so it seriously hinders work efficiency and economic development.In other words, there are indeed many poor countries near the equator, but the main reason is not geography and climate, but a good and inclusive system.

The Nobel Prize judges believe that the explanation proposed by this study and demonstration is convincing, that is, the emergence of the social structure or system once causes the extractive system.It is the root cause of social poverty.

Three scholars are based on multiple colonies in European colonial history.In the reason for the prize, the judges took Nogales, the Spanish colonial town of the United States and Mexico as an example.This place now belongs to the United States, and the south belongs to Mexico. The two places are rich in poor and poor.The interpretation of scholars is attributed to the mentality of most colonists: in the densely populated colonies, fewer colonists are willing to live long, and the political and economic system thinking of rule is mainly based on short -term extracting resources and labor.Where the living conditions are better, the colonists are willing to take root. In the construction of the political and economic system, the long -term stability of the European owner's country will be more tolerant, which is more tolerant, including political democratization.Therefore, after the colonial owner left, the originally densely populated place, because of not leaving a firm system building, was quickly blinded by the leader of the leader after the Lord, which caused it to fall into long -term poverty. Originally, it was originally.It is very difficult to change the social system and continue to benefit emerging rulers.

The difference between Northern Northern Northern to the south is the traces of the Spanish colonists' policy differences at the beginning.Three scholars believe that this mentality generally exists in British, French Portuguese and other colonists.Their research has also found that this phenomenon of "flipping of wealth" -The wealthy colonial period and poverty after colonization are the characteristics of colonial history. The previous historical survey did not discover this before.

Disease is another reason for the long living of the colonists.The diseases and health threats in India are much more than Australia and New Zealand. It brings greater life threats for European colonists, so they are even more unwilling to take root in India.Because you don't want to stay long, there is no motivation to improve sanitation and prevent disease.This is a cycle.

Based on these obvious reasons, the colonists are attentive and perfect about the establishment of the colonial system, and how good the models can be based on the patterns after the colonization.Today, we should be able to understand that the result of the later development of the country's later development depends on the choice of the founders and the people, and we can no longer buckle their hats on the colonists.

The so -called tolerance political and economic system refers to the system of economic freedom and governance according to law. It has long been conducive to everyone in society and can constantly produce positive effects.The protection of private property rights by the rule of law will help protect business interests and stimulate the motivation to create profits by the people; the complex checks and balance mechanism within democracy can maintain the independent operation of the rule of law.This series of mechanisms are the cornerstones of the stability and long -term development of the entire capitalism and modern economy, which helps the country to become rich.

Many founders after the colonial rule violated the original intention of anti -colonialness, and did not share power with the people, and could not bring economic results. One important reason was that they were trapped in the small circle or indulged in the money.Establish authority with the means of deception and fooling, leading to the sense of trust in the people's trust. In the end, it can only rely on violence to continue the rule and exacerbate the decline of the economy.

In the article "I" and "He", which was killed on September 30, 2007, the author listed several types of the founding of the country after the colonization.One is the killing battlefield of the warlord melee in Africa; the second is the royal rule of the Arab world; the third is a group of people who have transformed into the new colonial rulers.The fourth is relatively good, can continue or establish a democratic system, so that the people can enjoy political rights and strive to build the economy.Some people on colonialism also pointed out that different colonists such as Britain, France, and Portuguese have different mentality and style, and may also decide whether they have established an inclusive political and economic system.

This year's Economics Award is relatively profound equation and theory, but has strong empirical evidence, explaining many phenomena and causes of human history.There is still a good exposition in the reasons for the reasons for the country's wealth, including the quality of human beings; late is even attempts to demonstrate whether the state can concentrate its strength.

The key conclusions of

Three researchers are that the free democratic system can help establish an inclusive economic environment. From today's wealthy countries, most democratic countries can prove this.This is also well understood.Although there are also cases of wealthy king's, military and political, and one -party dictatorship in modern times, it is useless to concluded that because the rich countries rely on some market -oriented mechanism, if this mechanism cannot be adhered to and improved, the country's wealth is very affluent.It may be biased or short -term wealth.If you adhere to and improve the market mechanism for a long time, politics will inevitably face the process of transformation to democratization; this is the experience summary of the four Asian dragons.

The results of this research were previously colonial, but they were also applicable to a few countries that had never been colonized.The fundamental reason for the rich and the poor is whether the political and economic system can be improved and improved, and the underlying logic is whether the power of the country is controlled by a good person, and whether the choice of the founding path is relatively selfless.Even if it is the front colony, the North and South Korean penalty north and south are different from hell because of the different choices of subsequent systems.

This year's Nobel Prize in Economics, not only the theory that scholars have been concluded in the study and fields, but also the lesson of blood on earth.