The rich also have the right to speak for their own political ideas, but let them pour wealth to support a certain political party or candidate, which means that the gold master can play an influence without restriction, directly control public opinion, and indirectly affect the impactFuture policy considerations.
As long as you register as a voter, you may win $ 1 million (about S $ 1.32 million).Do you be so beautiful?
Musk Mask, the richest man in the United States, who has never played cards, suddenly announced last week that it would send $ 1 million to a key voter of a key daily swinging state before the voting day.The condition is that this person must be registered as a voter, and signed the online petition to support Musk's online petition, expressing supporting freedom of speech and holding the right to hold guns.
There are no provisions of the petition, nor can it be confirmed that the prizes who win the voters finally vote for it, and even if they really vote for their own votes in the election on November 5.Musk bet that these six -digit colored heads can attract the original voting willingness, and the United States citizen who supports Republican Party registered as a voter and participated in voting.
Musk has already expressed his strength to support the Republican presidential candidate Trump.Protecting the right to protect the rights of guns is exactly the strong respect for Trump; although his opponent and Democratic presidential candidate Harris did not intend to ban guns, he supported more stringent control.
In the United States, buying votes is illegal.Musk then walked around such a big bend, but everyone was clear.In fact, Musk was not the first to draw a candidate with strong financial resources, but he was more high -profile, but he was more ingenious.
The US election is definitely a "burning money" competition. This is always the case. In recent years, it has become more and more burned.According to data from the Federal Election Commission, candidates and political parties spent a total of $ 14.4 billion in the Presidential and Congress elections in 2020, which is twice as high as the US $ 6.5 billion in 2016.According to media reports, the campaign funds raised by the president and Congress candidate for this year have exceeded the 2020 records.
Compared with many democratic countries, the campaign expenses in the United States are particularly high. One of the reasons is that the campaign period is particularly long.The United States Democratic Republican parties determine the presidential candidate by primary election, which means that the year before the presidential election, candidates who intend to run for the election will start planning.In addition, all seats in the US House of Representatives and about one -third of the Senate must be re -elected every two years. The country is almost in the preparation of a certain campaign.
In many democratic countries, including Canada, the United Kingdom, France, Singapore, etc., will formulate the upper limit for the election overhead.However, not only did the U.S. Election Commission not do this, the Supreme Court also decided in 1976 to restrict the publicity expenses of political views and the first amendment to the constitution that violates the freedom of protection.
In terms of political donations, although the campaign committee has a personal donation limit, there are large baskets to drill.The Super Political Action Commitee, which is established by interest groups and enterprises, is not limited by donation.This originated from the 2010 ruling of the Supreme Court, saying that political donations are also one of the ways of expression of freedom of speech.Although these political committees claim to have no party membership, political tendencies know that they are well known that they have opened the door for the rich to support the rich candidates to influence political influence on politics.
Although not 100 %, in previous elections, candidates with the most strong campaign funds have achieved the final victory because they have enough silver bombs to target the content of customer -based political propaganda for specific groups.This is why the US election reports always closely track the fundraising of candidates, which is rarely seen in other countries.
As the so -called short -handed person, no political figures will admit that the millions of dollars of political donations of the institution or individual indirectly obtained, and it is specially considered by the gold master when formulating a policy.However, taking the US gun control as an example, despite the repeated large -scale shooting, the two parties have almost no one firmly called for the prohibition of guns. Even if it supports enhanced control, it is always careful when speaking.Among the many considerations, the 10 million yuan of funds from the National Rifle Association's elections will inevitably flashes in their minds.
In order to protect freedom of speech, the United States is unwilling to set up too many restrictions on political donations and campaign expenses.Indeed, the rich also has the right to speak for their own political ideas, but let them devote wealth to support a certain party or candidate, which means that the gold master can play an influence without limitedly, directly control public opinion, and indirectly affect future policy considerations in the future policy considerationsEssenceSuch a mechanism may be free to preserve speech, but there is a principles of the same right to speak in the democratic system, which will inevitably weaken people's trust in decision makers.
