With the Palestinian radicals Hamas earlier last month, a series of attacks launched in Israel, and the large -scale retaliation or punitive blows launched by Israel afterwards.Thousands of civilians and injuries have once again become the focus of the world's attention.
The vast majority of Western countries led by the United States are more sympathetic to Israel's encounters, especially the United States immediately dispatched two aircraft carrier strike groups (including the latest Ford carrier) to the Israeli shore.A large number of weapons and equipment are not only extracted from the arsenal deployed in Israel, but also transferred to part of Ukraine to Israel.Biden Biden, who was not close to the Israeli right -wing government at first, even gave a television speaker, calling on Congress to specialize in specializing in military aid Israel (and Ukraine, etc.), which can be described as one side support.After the British and European leaders also visited Israel, they went to Israel to condolences.
However, in a larger number of developing countries, although it may not support Hamas's radical actions, most of them refuse to define Hamas as a terrorist organization, let alone condemning Hamas's attack.These countries emphasize that when commenting on the Pakistan, the so -called "fundamental reason."In their opinion, the root cause can be divided into three categories of interconnection.
One is the most basic, broader so -called so -called Jewish stateism (or Zionism) legitimacy or legitimacy.Many developing countries that have been ruled by Western powers have regarded Zionism as the continuation or conspiracy of colonialism, especially the large -scale rise of Zionism.The Jews are welcome to move to Palestine and start significantly.Some people also see the Jews who moved to Palestine (even if their fate was bumpy) and their descendants as new colonists, and believed that the latter caused the local Palestinian to become a secondary population or displacement.Therefore, these developing countries have a certain degree of "comparing their hearts to the heart" and believe that they should support the founding demands of the Pakistan people and drive the Jews, especially Zianists, out of Palestine.This thinking has common to a certain extent with Hamas's political position.
The second is that many developing countries believe that the "fundamental reason" of Pakistani conflicts is that even more transliterate is allowed to be allowed even if Zianism has legitimacy, that is, the founding of Israel is allowed, but at least Israel was at the end of the last century and the original.Since the beginning of the century, increasingly positive colonial movements have seriously harmed the interests of Palestinians.During this time when the right -wing ruling Israeli, many sturdy Jewish reclamation colonies did not hesitate to open into the Pakistan's settlement, which was internationally recognized as the west bank of the Jordan River occupied by Israel to drive away the local Pakistan who lived for a long time and developed rapidly.For Jewish town.This strong reclamation act is usually acquired or supported by Israel officials, at least for Israeli armed protection.This has led to the substantial division of the West Coast. Many Ba people cannot live in dignity at all, let alone the hope of the founding of the country.
Many developing countries also support the "two countries' solutions", that is, Evai and Pakistan should be able to coexist peacefully.However, the Israeli extreme right -wing government does not agree with the plans of the two countries, and believes that including the West Coast, which are all hometown of Jews since ancient times, should be included in Israel.This is the same as those who have the first type of "fundamental reasons", but the latter believes that Israel has no right to survive.
Third, it is believed that the "fundamental cause" to handle the country that can deal with the Pakistani conflict is compared from the religious perspective, that is, the attitude of "the world's Muslims is also a brother" to look at this problem.These Muslim population -oriented countries believe that Israel should not exist at all, or even if they exist, they should not promote the colonial policies.The long -term religious worship arrangement of "river water does not commit well well water".For example, some Israeli politicians and even the army have repeatedly entered and exit Muslims on the Temple Mountains. They are considered to be seriously contaminated by Muslims, which should be converted together or at least strong opposition.In their eyes, Hamas's recent atrocities are just aimed at a part of Israel's self -defense counterattack. They should not be discussed alone, but they must be understood from the perspective of the conflict between Yiba Zero (either you die or I live).
Therefore, although more and more Arab countries have established formal diplomatic relations with Israel under the Arab country in recent years.Instead, some South Asia and Southeast Asian countries with a lot of Muslims, regardless of government or Muslims, are shouting for the Palestinian founding movement.
In Malaysia, Palestinian topics have become one of the few subjects in politics to surpass the party's opposition and unite the Muslim people. At least support the Pakistan to fight against Israel, which has become the political correctness of Malaysia.The Islamic Party in the wild must adhere to the concept of unity with the Ba people.Malaysian Prime Minister Anhua was a well -known internationally renowned Muslim sports leader when he was young. At present, he will also become a advertisement figure in the Muslim world to consolidate his regime that is increasingly impacted by domestic religious supremacy.Therefore, whether it is the government or the mainstream of Muslims, it spares no effort to support the struggle of Bauren in verbal and momentum. Even such a explicit approach may be hesitant to be pro -Israel's Western Merchant Cup Ge.Ideological empathy and urgent political needs seem to be absolutely preferred.To a large extent, it is also the primary consideration of many similar countries in this conflict. Whether it is the most wise, see the wisdom.
The author is a senior researcher at the Singapore International Affairs Society (Research Institute)
Chief Counselor of the Malaysian Pacific Research Center
