In the past few months of Lianhe Zaobao Speech Edition, many scholars, experts and readers have published the principles, use and expectations of ChatGPT, and made analysis, explanation and comments.According to the informal statistics of the author after reading, these reviews can be roughly divided into two categories, one is professionals related to artificial intelligence (AI), explaining from the evolution of digital technology and AI, and positive positive on ChatGPT to the frontEvaluation and high hopes for development.The other type is the "experience" perception of "experience" after using ChatGPT.The impression of ChatGPT is mixed, and it is difficult to distinguish it for a while.
I ask Chatgpt, who is it?Does it have life?The answer to such questions is: "I am an artificial intelligence program, I don't have a real life. I am just a computing program composed of code and algorithm. There is no self -awareness, emotion and feeling. My main function is to dealAnalyze a large amount of text data and generate corresponding answers. "ChatGPT has no life, and basically the" variety "that is incompatible with humans in biology.
I teach in a private college and is responsible for teaching related subjects in corporate management.In these subjects, such as: management and organizational theory and behavior, the evaluation of students' learning results at the end of the period, generally there are personal homework, group operations and presentation, classroom participation, and final examinations (these evaluation projects, etc., depending on individuals depending on individualsThe specifications of subjects or colleges are different).Among the four items listed above, the first two items have something to do with ChatGPT.Because students can help them get relevant knowledge and information through ChatGPT, the problems caused by the "cutting and stickers" from the computer in the process of personal work writing are concerned by academic "plagiarism".Therefore, the originality and authenticity of homework are questionable.
It is quite challenging to identify whether the student's homework is plagiarized and how to make a judgment effectively.This is to encourage students to emphasize when using ChatGPT.However, in terms of assisting students to obtain knowledge and finding information, ChatGPT can indeed achieve "the talent does not go out and know the world". At least, it is not necessary to run in the library like that.
In terms of teaching academic personnel, a habit developed is that they must read the knowledge in the field of teaching related in their own teaching to achieve the knowledge of knowledge and the times.In less than two or three years after publishing, some subjects have less than two or three years. At least the relevant knowledge can no longer show the actual situation at the moment, such as the international business information and data involved in the International Commerce.Therefore, in this regard, it is questionable whether teaching staff can use ChatGPT.Especially the development of academic development and academic spirit.
In the study of high -level academic research and the publishing of specialized books, some books are based on the research experience of 10, 20 or even 30 years after the relevant scholars or writers, often spend two or three years or even five years.EssenceIn addition, the manuscript of the writing process must be reviewed by other scholars in the field of expertise and put forward comments and suggestions.Some high -level research topics must be confirmed to the accuracy of their professional knowledge after reading.Finally, the professional editor is processed. For example, the original text is not so academic to adapt to the degree of fluentity of ordinary readers, or to improve the fluentity of the text, and without losing the original intention of the original author.These show the seriousness, collective collaboration and team spirit of professional works, whether ChatGPT can challenge in this regard, or shake the traditional operation, which is questionable.
In the book of Neuroscience for Leaders, the author of the author Dimedydis and Pisaltisia, brings together the works and research conclusions of brain science related fields and psychologists, explaining that"FMRI (Functional Magnetic Evaporation) and other technologies such as neurology, biological statistics, and brain wave detection have made significant contributions to brain research." "The brain determines our behavior, including emotion, thought and action."Although this book is mainly based on leadership, it conveys the development of brain science. In terms of traditional psychological understanding of people, it does propose a lot of novel discoveries and visions.
In addition, this book also proposes a topic that we must think: "When people make decisions, they are not rational.Consciousness, emotions, and feelings are just a computing program composed of code and algorithms. "Whether it can challenge people with flesh and blood, thoughtful feelings, but also depends on the development of brain science and other people's research on people.Is ChatGPT universal?Not necessarily, at least not at present.
(The author is a part -time lecturer of a local private college)
