China Times News: The Kuomintangs palace is even more unsuccessful

Source: China Times

The Kuomintang was anxious to remove the labels of the pro -China Selling Taiwan, and went out of the election campaign to frustrate the shadow. A few days ago, the four major reform plans were proposed. Among them, the most noticeable cross -strait discussion on the fundamental principle of the development of the Kuomintang's development is highly concerned.The issue of consensus in 1992 was the most disappointing. After the plan was announced, Ma Ying -jeou and Wu Dunyi both extended dissatisfaction and even refused to go to the invitation to Chairman Jiang Qichen. Will the Kuomintang go to split?

The reform plan is revealed to adhere to the sovereignty of the Republic of China, protects freedom of human rights, maintains the security priority of Taiwan, and creates a win -win sharing and prosperity. It emphasizes the affirmation of the historical contribution of the 1992 consensus, the rejection of the one country, the two systems, and the mainland must face the principles of the Republic of China.It is no different from the DPP's claims.

Chairman Jiang Qichen criticized him in some people in the party, and seemed to have some emotions. Indeed, it was not appropriate to deny the reform plan of the Party Central Committee with the two words, but it cannot be denied.The DPP thinking judges the relationship between Taiwan and China, and the Party Central Committee will change the development direction of the Kuomintang with such a firm attitude.The Kuomintang is not small green, but is brainwashed by the green camp.

Abandon one middle school responsibility on the Democratic Progressive Party

The Democratic Progressive Party is fully governed, and the political territory and power are infinitely expanded. However, cross -strait relations have receded, and the risks of foreign relations have greatly increased. The only way of response is to condemn the CCP's suppression, stigmatize the 1992 consensus and the principles of the first Central China.The Kuomintang's new discussion emphasizes that he has never given up the 92 consensus, but deliberately maintains the distance, and replaces the concept of sovereignty replacement in the Republic of China. He calls on the CCP to face up to the Republic of China before there is a cross -strait consensus.Promoting the fact that each other does not recognize sovereignty and does not deny governance.If you want to ask Xi Jinping to propose a plan for one country, two systems to deny the ownership of each table in the first Chinese, should be at the DPP, not the 1992 consensus. The Kuomintang does not need to retreat and surrender.

President Tsai Ing -wen stated in the first inauguration speech in 2016 that he was willing to respect the historical facts of the 1992 talks and intend to develop a new consensus with the mainland. This year's inaugural speech has not been mentioned.2020 is fully ruling again, making President Cai more confident. They are willing to disclose with the Republic of China in Taiwan, and to greatly recognize the country.bye.

What's even more paradoxical is that the DPP has to be in power at least four years. The Kuomintang asked the CCP to respect Taiwan as a sovereign state. If there are any results, it will be the historic contribution of the DPP.For the fate of long -term tail party.As the opposition party, the Kuomintang unable to expose the DPP's contradictions and mistakes, but carefully reviewed the 1992 consensus. It is equivalent to the default 1992 consensus is the box office poison and indirectly solve the DPP. This is a serious strategic error.

Let the mainland hold hope for the harmony

The Kuomintang emphasized that only the cross -strait consensus on the Constitution can restart the official dialogue between the two sides of the strait.Regrettable and pity.

After being elected, Tsai Ing -wen proposed peace, peer, democracy, and dialogue 8 -character motto, but the people have no mutual trust. The official communication channels that have been interrupted for many years are difficult to recover.Based on the good interactive experience and mutual trust foundation of the Kuomintang, the Kuomintang has an advantage in relative possession. However, the Kuomintang has abolished their martial arts and abandoned important functions that can be exchanged in cross -strait exchanges.Recently, Ni Yongjie, deputy director of the Shanghai Taiwan Research Institute, in 2019, in 2019, Ke Wenzhe, who names the power of power like white power, wants to guide people from all walks of life in Taiwan to embark on the road of cross -strait negotiation.Essence

In fact, the 1992 consensus not only exists, but also in our daily life.For example, the ECFA based on the 1992 consensus was scolded by the former DPP Chairman Cai Yingwen as a sugar and coat poison, but the DPP still enjoyed the peace dividend brought by ECFA while denying the 1992 consensus, and even made public publicity.It is hoped that the CCP will not terminate, and only the Kuomintang will fall into the DPP's trap.

Even though the CCP's position on the principles of the first Central China and the unified cross -strait unification issues became stronger and stronger, but never abandoned the principles of peace, the Kuomintang advocated breaking the unified deadlock, taking a better path, and abandoning Ma Ying -jeou for not being unique or unified for martial arts.Wisdom will create more uncertain factors on both sides of the strait and the dilemma of ingenuity.

The epidemic has caused the US -China confrontation to intensify, and the Lianhe -US anti -China strategy of the DPP government has increased the potential risks of the Taiwan Strait, and it is difficult to maintain the status quo.The two sides of the strait need to maintain dynamic balance, and Sino -US relations are in conflict.It's right.