Text: Zhong Mingjiu
Recently, China and the United States have played a series of public opinion games around the new crown epidemic.Faced with the various allegations of the United States that continued to blame China's various allegations on China, Xinhua News Agency rarely released nine consecutive evaluations, and Chinese Ministry of Foreign Affairs spokesman Hua Chunying ridiculed. Recently, the Ministry of Foreign Affairs Congress has basically become Mr. Pompeo.The rumor is a rumor.
Trump's passing the pressure of epidemic prevention accountability
Zuo Xiying, an associate professor at the School of International Relations of Renmin University of China, told the author that he is more inclined to express the recent battle between Sino -US public opinion as a narrative about the epidemic.Regarding the cause of it, Sun Xingjie, deputy dean of the School of Public Diplomacy of Jilin University, believes that due to the epidemic situation in the United States, domestic politics in the United States will enter the stage of clarifying responsibility; coupled with the approaching US election, Democratic members want to investigate President Trump,Trump has pushed responsibilities to China.
Regarding the strong public opinion offensive initiated by the United States, Zuo Xiying said: Under the reaction of the United States, it is difficult to do anything in China.He believes that China ’s goal of responding to this narrative battle is expected to be two points: one is to hope that China and the United States can cooperate in epidemic prevention; second, the United States should seek truth from facts in public opinion, do not discredit China, do not make pressure on China unreasonably, so as to thus be pressed.Create a better public opinion environment for the development of Sino -US relations.
The recent official statements such as the Ministry of Foreign Affairs of China can be known that the facts, reasoning, respect, and conservation are still an important strategy and means of response to China.For example, China has repeatedly listed the timeline of Sino -US response to the epidemic in detail, and attempts to prove that China will notify the epidemic to the United States in a timely manner in a timely manner.China also clearly expressed the consistent position of the two advantages of the United States and the United States, and the fighting.Hua Chunying recently pointed out that China has always believed that the different civilization systems in the world can completely coexist, learn from each other, and make progress together. China and the United States are not enemies or opponents.Comrades.
It is worth noting that the current narrative battle between China and the United States has not expanded to other fields.Recently, the high -level Sino -US economic and trade consultation between the two parties led by the two parties to hold a call. Both parties stated that they should work hard to create favorable atmosphere and conditions for the implementation of the Sino -US economic and trade agreement and promote positive results.Some analysts pointed out that under the established pattern of the global industrial division of labor, it is difficult for China and the United States to truly split; and attempting to split China and the United States, it is also negative to the world as a whole.In this regard, China has consensus in many fields.
Controversy without expanding trade talks and still cooperation in other fields
However, Sino -US relations have indeed experienced friction and difficulties in recent years.Sun Xingjie said that the black swan this black swan further exacerbated the frictional surface of China and the United States. The two sides faced a series of challenges and problems and needed to re -position and adapt.However, as the Chinese saying, there are always more difficult methods.The key is whether the United States can form a far -reaching consensus on the prospects of Sino -US relations and its impact on the world, rather than any of the politicians who want to disrupt Sino -US relations only for political interests.
