Former Canadian chief judges Beverley McLachlin showed that they would retire for the full time next month and no longer renew their overseas judges overseas. British are very judges Cen Yaoxin PostIt means that the rule of law in Hong Kong has been damaged, especially in the Hong Kong government.The Hong Kong Government refers to the errors of remarks and no basis.
According to the Broadcasting Corporation of Canada on Tuesday (June 11), McLarian issued a statement saying that in order to accompany her family more, she will be in Hong Kong on July 29.Overseas of the hospital is a very judge's position."It is my honor to serve Hong Kong citizens. I have confidence in all judicial personnel in the court, as well as their independence and determination to maintain the rule of law."
Public information shows that McGarine, 81, obtained a barrister qualification in Alberta Province in 1969. In 1971, he obtained the qualification of a barrister in British Columbia and practiced simultaneously in both places.In April 1981, she was appointed judge of the Vancouver District Court, and was appointed as the Supreme Court of the British Columbia Province Supreme Court in September 1981.
In 1985, McLarien was appointed Judge of the Court of Appeal Court of British Columbia, and in 1988, he served as chief judge of the Supreme Court of British Columbia.She was sworn in the Supreme Court of Canada in that year and served as the Chief Justice of Canada from 2000 to 2017.In 2018, she became a very judge overseas in the Hong Kong Court.
The Overseas Council of the Hong Kong Court is a very important judge. After McLarin does not continue, it will be reduced to seven people, including He Fuming, Liao Baijia, Fan Lishen, and Oussean from the United Kingdom; Gan Muxian, Fan Liquan, and Qixian from Australiarighteous.
The Hong Kong Government spokesman expressed his gratitude to McLarian in the news bulletin in the news bulletin in the news bulletin in the news bulletin in the journey to the Hong Kong judicial system and his objective evaluation of the rule of law in Hong Kong.
However, the Hong Kong Government also refuted the remarks of Cen Yaoxin, who had resigned as a judge who had resigned.Reuters quoted the article published by Cen Yaoxin in the Financial Times, saying that the judge's ruling was free to be restricted by the National Security Law. Mainland China will revoke the unremitting judgment, and Hong Kong officials are also suspicious of political objections.
He said: "Hong Kong was a community full of vitality and political diversification, and gradually became a total of totalitarianism. The rule of law in Hong Kong has been damaged, especially in the Hong Kong government."
A spokesman for the Hong Kong Government stated in the news bulletin that he did not agree with the personal opinions of Cen Yaoxin's personal opinion on the rule of law and independent judicial power of Hong Kong.The most important thing is that when the Hong Kong courts tried a national security case or any nature of any nature, it was definitely not affected by any political pressure from the central or special zone governments, and the rule of law in Hong Kong did not retreat.No matter what reason or motivation to put forward the opposite conclusion, no matter what reason or motivation, it is completely wrong and basically not based. The Hong Kong government must refute justice.
