The relevant report on the Fukushima nuclear processing water programs of the International Atomic Energy Agency (IAEA) has questioned Hong Kong experts that the opinions of IAEA's internal experts are not consistent.
According to the report, Lu Binglin, chairman of the Hong Kong Nuclear Society, said on Wednesday (July 5) on the Shangtai program on a sunny day that some words of the report lack certainty, the wording is not directly, or IAEA indicates IAEAAExperts are not unanimous opinions, I hope IAEA can further explain.
Lu Binglin for example, the IAEA report mostly uses "know (not)" instead of "agree". It can be interpreted as institutAgree with the approach.
Lu Binglin judged that although most of the experts in the institution agreed, some experts also questioned, so they failed to reach a consensus, making the report of the report.
The Director -General of the IAEA, Grace, who was visiting Japan on Tuesday (July 4), met with the Japanese Prime Minister Kishida Wenxiong, and announced the final safety review report of the discharge of radiation treatment of the Fukushima nuclear power plant."According to Tokyo Electric Power Company's current plans to be controlled and discharged in stages according to the current plan of Tokyo Electric Power Company. This can be ignored on the influence of radiation of humans and the environment." However, he also emphasized that the water treated with emissions is the decision of the Japanese government. This is the decision of the Japanese government. This is the decision of the Japanese government.The first report is neither recommended nor a standard for approval policies.
Regarding the report of IAEA, the Chinese National Atomic Energy Agency stated that the report failed to fully reflect all experts' opinions. The conclusion has limitations and one -sidedness, and China has regretted IAEA's reporting reports.
