On September 25, the Supreme People's Court, the Supreme People's Procuratorate, and the Ministry of Public Security jointly issued guidance on punishment of cyber violations in accordance with the law (hereinafter referred to as the opinions).This is a heavy judicial policy document specifically formulated for illegal crimes against cyber storms.
From the publicly soliciting opinions from the "two highs and one" in June this year, the dust was settled, the opinion responded to the heavy social concerns, and it also provided a clear judicial basis for the next cyber violence governance.As a result, once the news was disclosed, it quickly attracted widespread attention.
With the prosperity of the Internet, the "keyboard man" has also begun to act on the Internet.From Jiang Qiulian, the mother of Jiang Ge, to the mother of Wuhan who was hit by a elementary school student on the eve of Children's Day this year.
Earlier this year, Zheng Linghua, a post -95 girl with pink hair, died of depression after half a year after being continued for half a year.Earlier, she wrote on Weibo: "The Internet violence will last more than two months to harass from morning to night; abuse your family, close relationships, personality; human meat search for your contact information, family address; call to send by callSMS harassment; threatening your school, company, and even family; pulling gangs on the Internet will cause huge negative public opinion. "
Under the previous judicial framework, the lack of regulations on the connotation and extension of cyber violence concepts, and lack of standardized standards.For the vast majority of Internet violence, they pursue "the law and not blame the public" and believe that "just say two words of wind and cool words is not sin."Such a concept is so ingrained that many Internet violence has no fear.
The opinions of this time adhere to the problem orientation, clarify the many guilty manifestations of cyber violence, and correspond to the crime of criminal violence with criminal law.In punishment, no crime of cyber storm can escape the severe punishment of the law.
Not only that, the opinions clearly focus on cracking down on malicious initiator, organizer, malicious push -to -ammers, and repeated teachings.For "the implementation of minors and disabled people", "Organizing 'Water Army' 'Persons' Persons' Personal", "Topping' Topics' Topics to infringe on their personality dignity", "using 'depth synthesis' and other generation of artificial artificial artificial articlesIntelligent technology releases illegal information "" network service providers initiated and organized "5 kinds of cyber violations of violations of laws, and the opinions clearly punish them according to law.
Opinions also mention the legal protection of ordinary public, pointing out that "the general public is the object of infringement, and the relevant information spreads on the Internet on a large area, causing a lot of vulgar and malicious comments, severely damaging the network order, and harsh social impact."It should be identified as "serious harm to social order."
Also, the platform responsibility that has been emphasized before has also been defined from the legal level.The opinions point out that the network service provider's discovered network violence information does not fulfill the information network security management obligations in accordance with the law, causing a large number of illegal information to spread or have other serious circumstances to harm social public interests, and the People's Procuratorate can file a public interest lawsuit to the people's court in accordance with the law.Essence
On the same day of the opinion of the opinions, the Supreme Law also released a number of typical cases of punishing cyclical violations of cyber violations in accordance with the law.These cases not only provide specific guidelines for law enforcement judicial practice, but also define the boundaries of the behavior on the legally voicing of netizens, and reflect the firm determination of law enforcement and judicial organs to seriously investigate the legal responsibility of online storms in accordance with the law.
Cyber violence has been guilty, and anonymous speeches should be responsible.A clear network environment must not only rely on Internet users, but also rely on legal correction.Everyone has the right to express, but it is not only wrong to indulge in indulgence and speaking, it is likely to be sin.No one has the right to others.
