The investigation officer of the Taiwan Investigation Bureau Yu Zhenghuang recently accused the former Hsinchu Mayor Lin Zhijian copied the papers to infringe the copyright. The Taipei District Court opened the trial on Wednesday (January 11).Lin Zhijian insisted in the court that he had no plagiarism or plead of guilty, and he referred to himself that he was the victim.
Comprehensive reports from Taiwan and the Central News Agency reported that the Taipei District Court held a procedural preparation court on Wednesday afternoon. This is the first trial of the case.
Lin Zhijian said in court that in 2014, he participated in the Hsinchu Chief Election and used relevant polls as the basis for the papers. The relevant polls were provided by himself.He created this paper, without motivation and need to copy Yu Zhenghuang's papers, so he did not have the problem of plagiarism or guilty.
Attorney Lin Zhijian also prepared more than 20,000 words to answer the defense, trying to prove that Yu Zhenghuang's paper is to infringe Lin Zhijian's copyright, and Yu Zhenghuang has no right to sue himself.
Lin Zhijian claimed that he first completed the papers sent to Chen Mingtong.When the judge asked about the location of the paper, Lin Zhijian replied that the place where he met with Chen Mingtong was in the teacher's office; if others were in Taipei, they were writing papers in school. If he was in Hsinchu, it was not necessarily.
Lin Zhijian also said that Yu Zhenghuang thought that there was plagiarism, he felt very wronged, and accused Yu Zhenghuang who was manipulating the Hsinchu City to choose a situation, instead claiming that he was the victim.
Yu Zhenghuang's lawyer's court proposed that Yu Zhenghuang and Lin Zhijian's two master's dissertation comparison forms were compared with 33 paragraphs, and Yu Zhenghuang's papers were quoted, but Lin Zhijian did not have any illegal and unbelievable.
Whether the two sides can use the Taiwan University Academic Ethical Evaluation Council (determined that it is Lin Zhijian plagiarism) as the evidence of this case and the time point part should be judged by the two -person papers.Debate such as comparison.Tingxun ended at about an hour, and the judge at the end of the court knew that after two manufacturing provided information, he continued to hear.
When Lin Zhijian left the court, he did not respond to the media inquiry.Lin Zhijian's lawyer Hu Zhongwei said in a joint media interview that Yu Zhenghuang should appear in court to explain that in the end which part of the paper has plagiarism, and do not hide behind the lawyer.
Yu Junda, a lawyer of Yu Zhenghuang, interviewed that Yu Zhenghuang was an obscure civil servant of the Investigation Bureau, but because Lin Zhijian was running for the argument of the argument for plagiarism, Yu Zhenghuang was the victim.The innocence of personality and the right to serve the official organs were forced to be helpless, and then decided to find justice by mentioning a self -prosecution.
In addition, Yu Zhenghuang's lawyer Zhang Youqi said that Yu Zhenghuang believes that Lin Zhijian has a reputation of infringing Yu when plagiarizing the storm. On Wednesday, he will report to the Taipei Procuratorate to sue Lin Zhijian for suspicion of slander.
Lin Zhijian announced that after the candidate for the mayor of Taoyuan, he was disclosed that his master's dissertation at the National Development Institute of Taiwan University was suspected of plagiarizing Yu Zhenghuang.On August 9 last year, Taiwan University held a press conference to announce the resolution of the academic ethics review meeting. It was found that Lin Zhijian and Yu Zhenghuang's thesis were highly overlap, and Yu Zhenghuang's paper was completed half a year. Lin Zhijian could not propose a counter -certificate.
Yu Zhenghuang later entrusted lawyers Wu Junda, Zhang Youqi, and Zeng Weikai to the Taipei District Court to filed a criminal self -prosecution, accusing Lin Zhijian's suspicion of violating the copyright law.
