Guizhou Province disclosed the director of Anshun Malaysias original public secu

Guizhou Province, China, disclosed for the first time that Zhou Yun, former public security director of Anshun City, Guizhou Province, who had previously notified the dismissal, had been suspected of opening an armed escort company for others.

The Guizhou Provincial Commission for Discipline Inspection and Supervision on Monday (September 2) issued a notification on the typical cases of incompetence and corruption issues around the eight people from the official website, which disclosed Zhou YunCase.

The notification shows that from 2004 to 2018, Zhou Yun used as a member of the Standing Committee of the Anshun Municipal Party Committee, the Secretary of the Political and Legal Committee of the Municipal Party Committee, Secretary of the Party Committee of the Municipal Public Security Bureau, and director to open a vehicle inspection station and the vehicle inspection station and the Anshun on the Anshun.It helps for armed escort companies, driving schools, and fire acceptance in real estate projects, and illegally accept huge property of others.Zhou Yun also exists in other serious violations of discipline and law.

Zhou Yun, 67, has long served as the Guizhou Provincial Public Security Department for a long time.In 2004, Zhou Yun served as Deputy Secretary of the Political and Legal Committee of the Anshun Municipal Party Committee and Director of the Municipal Public Security Bureau.Month was removed from office.

In the past seven years, the Guizhou Provincial Discipline Inspection Commission notified Zhou Yun in January this year, and was opened in July of the same year (the Communist Party of China was expelled from the Communist Party of China and public office).

The double -opening notification at the time pointed out that Zhou Yun lost his ideals and beliefs, abandoned his original mission, and engaged in "seven of them".Ignore the organization principles and do not report personal matters in accordance with regulations. It is not as explained to the problem when the organizational conversation letter. It illegally seek personnel interests and receive property for others;; There is no fear of party discipline and national law, engaging in power and money transactions, using the convenience of the job to seek benefits for others, and illegally accepting huge amounts of property.