Berg, a senior researcher at the American Planning of the Washington Think Tank Strategy International Research Center, pointed out that in the past 10 years, the influence of the United States in Latin America has been declining.Prosperity is taken for granted, without mobilizing resources to counter the economic influence of China in the local area.

(Los Angeles Composite Electric) The United States originally hoped that through the improvement of the American Summit in Los Angeles and its relationship with Latin American countries, it curved China's increasingly expanding influence in related regions, but President Biden did not make it during the summit.Actual and specific commitments, coupled with the anti -conference of leaders of many countries, the Bayeng government will face arduous challenges to restore the influence of the United States in Latin America.

Bayeng announced at the Ninth America Summit a few days ago that the economic partnership with the Western Hemisphere countries planned "American Economic Prosperity Partnership", but it did not make further promises, including the market access or funds of the American country.Just talk about it.

The Chatham House, the Londa, and the American and American senior researchers, Sabatini, in Latin America, the United States has no ability to provide too many advantages to American countries. Therefore, this summit isa mistake.

He said: "I think the hemisphere country has the same principles and goals because of its geographical location, and this idea has no longer existed."

Berg, a senior researcher at the American Planning of the Washington Think Tank Strategy International Research Center, pointed out that in the past 10 years, the influence of the United States in the Latin American region has been declining, and this situation has been asked by the United States because the United States lacks lack of Latin America for Latin America for a long time.Following, the stability and prosperity of the stability and prosperity there are taken for granted. It has not mobilized the necessary resources to counter the economic influence of China in the local area.

He said that if China continues to allow China to "freely play" in the Latin American region, it may destroy the goal of establishing "American Economic Prosperity Partnership".

China has provided about $ 150 billion in loans to Latin American countries in 2005

The United States has always regarded China as the biggest competitor. At present, China has indeed become the second largest business partner in Latin America, as well as South America's largest business partner, and it is also the main import of large products such as soybeans and oil in South America.country.

Since 2005, China has provided a loan of approximately $ 150 billion (about S $ 208.2 billion) to Latin American countries, of which nearly half lent to Venezuela in the way without any political conditions, which has caused some countries to criticize. China is criticized. China is criticized. China is criticized. ChinaThis is the same as setting up a "debt trap" for these developing countries.

During the

Summit, the United States promised to strengthen cooperation with regional countries in terms of economic and trade, food security, public health, climate change, and immigration issues.On the last day of the summit, the United States also promoted a series of immigration plans, saying that these plans would adopt methods such as strengthening cooperation to solve the current Latin American immigration problem.But analysts generally question whether these plans can have significant impact.At the same time, the so -called immigration protection and other content proposed by the United States in this summit was also considered by public opinion to try to shirk responsibility and let relevant Latin American countries bear more liability for immigration problems.

Venezuela President Madro said that the peak will not have any substantial contents of poverty and employment issues that are concerned with the American people, which can be called "completely failed."

In addition, before the summit, the United States did not invite Cuba, Venezuela and Nicaragua leaders to attend before the summit, which led to Mexican President Lopez announced his resistance. Guatemala, Honduras, and Salvador sent low -level delegations to attend the meeting.It was also one of the factors that made the summit endlessly ended last Friday.

The New York Times published a comment saying that the current summit was originally aimed at highlighting cooperation among American countries, but the absence of leaders of many countries was questioned to solve the substantial problems of the summit.The willingness to resist US leadership is increasing.