Reading the local election management of the US official website, it can be seen that this system is indeed a lot of loopholes.If you want to ask American voters to vote, what institution and voting are in fact, there is actually no unified answer.Therefore, the result of the presidential election in the United States is a considerable degree of conscience of each local government election official.
The U.S. presidential election has entered the countdown, both in the United States and several regional wars related to the United States, they are chaotic.In particular, the disaster relief performance after the Bayeng government after two hurricanes, in addition to the slow response, "would rather give AIA and illegal immigrants, not disaster relief with Chinese people," which makes Americans very cold.It is the key stage of the American election. In the US public opinion field, these two hurricanes have also changed from natural disasters to some extremely chaotic things. Even the former President Obama personally mobilized black people to vote.In addition to the continuous promotion of polls and forecasting articles as Harrisla, what exactly is the Democratic Party's to win the election?It should be said that I still want to re -apply the old trick of 2020.
Democratic Party opposes voting verification identity
In some key states and counties, such as California, Michigan's Detroit, Philadelphia, Pennsylvania, New York, etc., the Democratic Party poses a stubborn attitude and cheats tickets first. The legal punishment is afterwards.
The focus of the dispute between the two parties in this election is that the Republican Party requires voters to vote to show their identity proof and the Democratic Party opposes it.The following is some of the major actions taken by the Democratic government on the election recently.
On August 7, Yang Jin, the Governor of the Republican Party of Virginia signed an administrative order, requested the election commissioner to prove that the election department is "updating the daily voter list."These updates include "comparing the personal list of non -citizens with the personal list of non -citizens with the list of existing registered voters", eliminating those voters who cannot prove their citizenship.The U.S. Department of Justice announced on October 11 that it has filed a lawsuit against the Virginia, State Election Commission and State Election Commissioner, accusing the state on the eve of the November 5th election, to implement a systematic voter elimination plan, violating the registration of national voters in 19933333333333 voters registration in 1993Law (NVRA).Public opinion believes that the Ministry of Justice's move is to protect the state's non -citizen voting.
Each state of the United States is divided into five grades of authentication: strict check with photos with photos, strict checks that do not bring photos without photos, documents that need to be shown with photos, requiring documents (not required to bring photos), no documents need to be presented, no documents need to be presentedwait.According to the identification law of voters of various states, as of April 2024, 35 states have required voters to show their identity certificates on the election day (of which, 24 states require voters to show their identity certificate, 11 states have accepted other forms of other forms of other forms.Identity proof).The remaining 15 states do not require voters to show their identity proof on the election day. California, Washington Special Economic Zone, Massachusetts, New York, Hawaii, Oregon, Pennsylvania, Maryland, Minnesota, and Nevada are listed in "no identity documents".California has 54 electoral votes, which is the most important voting warehouse of the Democratic Party. Governor Newson recently signed the SB-1174 Act, which explicitly banned the county and cities from the county and cities.
Why does the US election have a situation that states are on their own?
Although the election of the President of the United States is very important for changes in the world's political pattern, many countries do not understand that the national elections in the United States, including the presidents and members of the Congress, actually lack the unified national management.In other words, local governments can be on their own.This is because the federal government in the United States does not belong to the centralized government, but a federal central government.This is related to the history of the United States, and the name of the country is the United States of America.The meaning of the public is that 50 states form this country to generate the federal government, instead of the central government to win the regime first, and then send officials to various places.Therefore, the federal government has limited power given by Congress, including the ability to control national elections.It can be said that the administrative official of the US federal government's election affairs on the local government is basically unable to directly intervene.
TheRepublican House controlled by the Republican Party has recently passed the guarantee of the US voters' qualifications (SAVE). In fact, they want to regulate the national elections, but they have been rejected by the Bayeng government.(See the remarks edition of the US verification of voters' identity bills on September 24?) In fact, even if it is passed, the Democratic Party also has a way to not implement it at the legal level.
The United States is not responsible for the election nationwide
Is the federal government election agency nationwide?Yes, the Federal Government does have the "US Electes Assistance Commission".The information provided by this committee for local government election officials mainly includes: Electioment Management Guidelines, including the 19 chapters of various election issues), the National Voter Regentration Form, and the election process simulation (Election Process Simulations, artificial intelligence and election management
However, the Federal Government's election assistance committee only provides guidance for elections across the country, and does not implement supervision of local elections.In other words, in terms of election, the federal government has no compulsory power on the local government, and the local government can be itself.
What would happen if the local government cheated in the election?The result can only be judicial lawsuits.First of all, the local prosecutor or a local member of a certain party filed a lawsuit, and then the local court made a decision; if the decision of the local court was dissatisfied, you can appeal to the premium court in the state;Federal courts in various states appealed.This process is quite lengthy, and it may take several years.In 2021, the Public Interest Legal Foundation (Pilf) had filed a lawsuit with the 2020,000 ghost votes in the 2020 election in the 2020 election, and the lawsuit was still ongoing.
What should I do if the local government's election fraud directly affects the results of the presidential election?The reality is that most of the Federal House of Representatives will first confirm the results of the established election of this fraud state and announce the election of the president (the case in 2020).Then there will be related lawsuits in the local level, but it must be delayed for a long time. The above -mentioned ghost voters are only two cases.The more famous case is the election fraud in Maricopa County, Arizona in 2020.The comprehensive legal audit work promoted by the State Senate was officially launched on April 23, 2021. The State Senate hired the Florida Cyber Ninjas to lead the audit.It involved more than 1,500 people before and after the audit, which took more than 100,000 hours, but the report emphasized that up to 53,305 votes may have problems.However, according to the official statistics of the state, Biden's votes in the state only issued more than 10,000 more votes than Trump.Arizona is one of the key swing states in the 2020 presidential election.Although this protracted lawsuit clarifies the truth, it was ruled by the judge as a public record and must not be made public.The whole process can be found on the American Oversight website.
Is the voting process transparent?
Whether the voting process is transparent depends on whether the supervisor hired by the local election center is not as fair.The "articles" of officials in Trust, Michigan, are arranged on the staff of the polling station.In view of the 2020 election night, DetroitAn unexpected late -night vote at the TCF Center changed the results of Michigan's election. During this year's election, many Republicans took the initiative to sign up as a voting station staff to have better opportunities to bring transparency and accountability to the voting process.At the beginning of August this year, the Detroit Election Commission appointed 2,337 Democratic Supervisors and 310 Republican supervisors.According to Republican investigations, at least 100 of them were confirmed to be Democrats who pretended to be a Republican.The Republican National Committee filed a lawsuit.Why do you want to fight for the right to supervise the number?This is to ensure the transparency of the voting process. After repeated communication with the Detroit Election Commission, the Republican National Committee (RNC) filed a lawsuit on the significant differences in the signing of the Republican election inspector.Although RNC has noticed this issue, their lawsuits are unlikely to bring any substantial changes before the election day.
Reading the official website of the United States (Election Administration at State and Local Levels), it can be glimpsed to glimpse this system.There are more than 10,000 election jurisdictions in the United States, with different scale, only hundreds of registered voters in the minimum, and more than 5 million registered voters in the largest jurisdiction.Each state has a chief election official, responsible for consulting the state and the federal election supervision or providing consultation.But usually, elections are carried out at the county level; in some states, cities or towns can also organize elections.No two states will manage elections in the same way, and there may be many differences even within one state.Elections can be managed by a single individual or department, election agency or election committee, or two or more entities.Based on the above situation, if you want to ask the American voters to vote, what institution and how to count the votes are actually uniformly answered.
Therefore, the results of the US presidential election are the conscience of each local government election official.For example, the North Carolina Election Commission has taken action. In the past two years, a total of 747,000 voters have been removed from the registration list (equivalent to one -tenth of the 7.7 million registered voters in the state).The main reasons for the large -scale cleaning of voters this time include: voters relocated (whether the unwavering in the state or the relocation of the state), the federal elections have not voted for two consecutive consecutive federal elections and have not responded to the official confirmation notice, death, felony crime, initiative, proactive initiative, initiativeRequires the name and lose the identity of the United States.
The election system architecture of the United States was left in the founding of the People's Republic of China. It is an election system that pays attention to conscience and is suitable for gentlemen.U.S. non -governmental organizations often go to developing countries to guide democracy. In fact, many election systems in emerging democratized countries or regions are more complete and strict than the United States (such as Taiwan).The American political textbook never talks about the weakness of its election system lacks reliability.The 2020 election confirmed a famous saying of the second president Adams: "Our government does not have the ability to deal with human emotions that are not subject to ethics and religious constraints. Our constitution is only developed for ethnic groups with morality and religious beliefs.Not enough to manage any other nation. This constitution is only suitable for people with morality and faith.
The author is a Chinese economist in the United States
