World geopolitics is undergoing fault changes. Traditional western sea power and Eurasian power power are fighting.EssenceThe fierce game and coexistence of the big power on the world islands will continue to affect us.The people of small nations are particularly vigilant.
Recently, Japan has ushered in Shi Po Mao, the new Prime Minister who has established the Asian version of NATO.This person was regarded as a hawk. When he published his first policy policy on Friday (October 4), he did not mention NATO, but reiterated the old tone: Today's Ukraine may be Tomorrow's East Asia.It can be seen that Japan will continue to implement current diplomatic and military policies to obey the command of the American elder brother.
After the Cold War, the United States continued to expand its NATO in the east in Europe and stepped forward to Russia. As a result, the Russian and Ukraine War was caused.What is the purpose of establishing the Asian version of NATO?This so -called Sima Zhao's heart is seen.Through NATO, the United States, with the help of the Agent war in Ukraine, dragged the entire European water to try to drag Russia and let the Europeans bear the cost, but it allows Washington to have a better effort to focus on the Asia -Pacific region and strengthen the suppression of China and the suppression of China and the suppression of China.Cover.However, it is difficult to establish the Asian version of NATO, because it knows that most of the Asia -Pacific countries should not choose the side stations. Therefore, it is transferred from Tokyo.In fact, the United States, Japan, Australia and Britain have formed a mini Asian version of NATO.
The real version of NATO is good, or the pocket version of Asia NATO, in fact, reflects the same American hegemonic thinking.To put it simply, the United States wants to continue to be the world's hegemon, and it is not tolerated to resist the court.According to the so -called offensive realist strategist, the United States must not allow the emergence of regional overlords in any place.The difference between these strategists in terms of views is that who may become regional overlords.From the perspective of Mearsheimer, a well -known international relationship scholar in the United States, Russia cannot achieve regional overlords, and NATO has blocked it, so the war in Ukraine was a strategic mistake.The most important thing to prevent is that China has become Asian hegemon.Therefore, the United States must focus on China, rather than waste resources to deal with Russia.
It is important to see such overlord thinking clearly because thinking determines action.Whether the United States will always follow such thinking or not will change the string more. In the face of reality, it will determine the formation of new world order in the future.The turmoil in front of us tells us that the United States and Western allies want to continue to maintain the single -pole hegemony after the Cold War. If the West insists on this thinking, the world turmoil will intensify, because the anti -single -polar power forces can no longer accept the hegemony.To do whatever he wants, tolerance, and to liberate the acts of democracy and freedom.They must build new, or return to the old Westphalia multi -polar power to balance the peaceful coexistence system.
According to the views of the Ukrainian war and the Euras World Order, which just published the Ukraine War and Eurasian World Order, which just published by Norwegian political scientist GlennThe world order has died, but the new order is still desired to live, so it is fiercely turbulent and conflict.
With the end of the Soviet Union and the end of the Cold War, the United States faced two options. One was to establish a monocular dominant world order, and the other was to return to the Westpilla peace system.It chooses the former.This is also the background thinking of NATO's eastward expansion, the purpose is to establish a pan -European security building to maintain and strengthen the Liberal Hegemonic Order.In this regard, although the Soviet Union's disintegration, Russia reluctantly resisted, but helpless.
Di Deson believes that today, 30 years later, the situation moved easy, and Russia finally decided to enter Ukraine, and the European free hegemony system also ended.More importantly, there is the rise of China.China and Russia are reluctant to follow the single hegemony led by the United States and Europe, so they are trying to create a multi-polar balance "Eurasian-WestPhalian World Order."This multi -pole system depends on the implementation of values based on democratic freedom, emphasizing the diversity of civilization and the equality of sovereignty and independence. Therefore, it opposes the West to impose its own value and model to other countries.
A new order of Eurasia is faintly moved.This was exactly what the US geopolitical scientist Zbigniew Brzezinski was most worried about in a big chess game.He quoted the perspective of British geopolitical scientist Halford Mackinder "World Island": controlling Eastern Europe is to control the heart, control the heart, is to control the world islands, and the world island to control the world.The so -called World Island refers to the mainland block connected by Asia, Europe and Africa throughout the earth.In contrast, the Americas, Australia, Japan and Britain are small islands.The heart of the World Island refers to the block from the Volga to the Yangtze River, from the Himalayas to the North Pole.Based on such a geopolitical concept, whoever controls Eurasia, whoever controls the fate of the world.Bujetzinski believes that the United States must work hard to operate the relationship with mainland Eurasia. It cannot allow any challengers in the mainland to rise, dominate Eurasia and challenge the United States.
The United States not only did not dissolve the NATO after the Cold War, but also expanded the scope of power to the entire Eastern Europe.Later, the great strategy of the Chinese Belt and Road Initiative seemed to control the world's islands and heart.Sure enough, that is, the world's 100 years of changes.How this struggle develops is indeed related to the fate of the whole world.
In any case, the facts show that the more the United States is worried about the universal status, the more they need to deter the world with force and disrupt the order of Eurasia.To the side of the polymer world.In Dyson's view, when the general trend is today, most of the world's needs are the world order of Welvilia, and Western, headed by Washington, is trying to re -occupy the world's domineering position.
Since the United States has not taken all kinds of economic means to overwhelm China and Russia, this battle about the future world order will continue militaryization.If the situation continues to deteriorate, the war of great powers may occur.Because the world is in the middle stage from a single pole to a multi -pole, the common rules have been generally reduced.The United States seems unwilling to accept a peaceful transition.It is likely to continue to describe this struggle as a struggle for good and evil, a struggle for democracy and dictatorship, and a struggle between the United States and China and Russia for global leadership.The author's conclusion is that if such Western thinking continues, human beings will face a major disaster.
In other words, the outbreak of nuclear war is not beyond people's imagination.Recently, Jeffrey Sachs, a well -known American economist Jeffrey Sachs and Mills Heimer, expressed deep concern.He strongly opposed the rise of Mills Heimer's rising, and he would inevitably seek a dominance, and he also strongly believed that China was not the threat of the United States.But if the strategic thinking of Washington is currently unchanged, the world may erupt nuclear war.
Will the United States change thinking?Former American black president Obama has publicly stated that we will never accept the second child.Not to mention the White President.There is a saying that it is not Washington that controls US foreign policy, but the "The Blob" behind it.Therefore, whoever enters the White House is the same.At present, it is difficult to change the consensus between China and Russia is the consensus between democracy and republics.Competition in the United States and China is no longer fair competition. Everything that the United States does is to break through the tires of Chinese cars.
There is no doubt that Dison is classified as a pro -Russian school, but his geopolitical views, especially the views on the Ukrainian war, have many similarities with Milsheimer, to provide us with another world trend in the world.The perspective is worthy of reference.World geopolitics is undergoing fault changes,Traditional Western sea power and Eurasian land power are fighting. Who will dominate the future development trend of Asia, Europe, and Africa (World Island) and have a personal relationship with us.At present, and the fierce games and coexistence of the world ’s great powers on the world’ s islands, we will definitely continue to affect us.The evolution of the future of the World Bureau is related to the formation of the new order of the multi -pole world, which will have a profound impact on all countries. The people of small countries must be highly vigilant.
The author is a former journalist, a former member of the Congress
