One thing may be unexpected by many audiences. The debate between this only vice presidential candidate has brought a little hope to many public concerns about the trend of American political polarization. TwoAlthough the party's state governance is seriously different from some issues, there are consensus on other issues, and these consensus is not only at the target level, but also on means and specific measures.
The Vice President of the Republican Vice President of the Democratic Party's Vice President of the Democratic Party not only shows the gentle and gentle side of the US political party's dispute, but also makes the audience see that the two parties have different governance programs.consensus.For issues with high consensus and low differences, such as how the United States treats the war between Israel and Hamas and Lebanon Allah, it is ignored here.The author focuses on several core issues that have appeared in Trump and Harris's debate. From the characteristics of coexistence and consensus, the two gentlemen's debate and the logic of its US presidential election.
Climate and Energy Policy: There is a trend of approaching the goal
Compared to Trump's denial of climate change, Wans adopted an interesting strategy when responding to this issue.He first acknowledged that climate change was human -led fossil energy consumption, which caused a large amount of carbon dioxide emissions, but the spin is about to focus on energy policy, that is, increase domestic fossil energy production.Wan Si believes that increasing US energy production can directly increase the employment of the energy industry and indirectly support the return of the manufacturing industry; on the other hand, comparedProducts contain lower unit carbon emissions.In this regard, the strategy of the Republican Party to deal with climate change is to produce more US energy, especially to increase the development of oil and natural gas.
For Waltz, there is no problem in increasing local energy production, and even fossil energy of some categories, such as natural gas, there is no problem. The key is how to deploy renewable energy faster, such as photovoltaic and wind power.Waltz has repeatedly mentioned the Biden's inflation and reduction bill to achieve this purpose in order to stimulate the rapid growth of the low -carbon energy industry in the country to solve climate change challenges.The United States has achieved self -sufficiency in energy supply through the shale gas revolution.Increase more local energy supply including natural gas, and use industrial incentive policies to enhance the consensus between the two parties in the favorable position of the United States in the global new energy supply chain;Implementation efficiency of policy.
Illegal immigration housing inflation: the goal is consistent, the means of different means
One of the characteristics of the debate between Wans and Waltz is to jump out of questions from the host and link different issues.For example, the influx of illegal immigrants will conduct comprehensive discussions on the impact of citizens on public services such as housing, medical services and education.Frankly speaking, immigrants are a problem leftover in history. Several predecessors and current presidents from the two parties should bear some responsibility.Regarding who should be responsible for illegal immigration issues, the dispute between the two is basically repeating the routine of Trump and Harris.One of the negative role played by the Trump's immigration bill was not approved by the Congress; the other bypassed Bayon, accusing Harris as vice presidents for more than three years on solving illegal immigration issues.
As for how to cope with the social impact of non -translation, such as a large number of non -transitional housing shortages, the plan given by the two highlights the differences between their respective political experience.Waltz, who has the experience of governor of Mingnasota, gives a more reasonable response, for example, providing low -income groups with subsidies for low -income groups, providing tax discounts to construction enterprises, and transforming old houses in urban areas to increase house supply.The lack of experience in the administrative department's post is given a general response, and in the speech, the focus was quickly transferred to the negative impact of non -transfer on the availability of residential housing.
abortion rights and medical services: Different goals and means are large
One of the rights to defend the unprepared life and the right to choose women's free choice; one advocates disclosure of medical expenses information to promote the reduction of medical expenditure costs.Let's control medical expenses.From this point of view, the differences between the two parties on these two issues are quite serious.Of course, the two resonate with better maternity leave and parenting benefits to support families.Whether it is Wan Si, who is raising three young children, or by government medical insurance services, Waltz, who finally realizes childcare and childcare, thinks that it is necessary to give priority to increasing maternity leave and parenting to the scope of funding at the federal level.of.Of course, the answers of the two of them lack new ideas for how to cope with the higher fiscal deficit brought by it.
Firefare flooding: Tengjin Space in the First Amendment
Gun holding guns is a civic rights protected by the American Constitution, but the result of the abuse of guns is what the vast majority of Americans are unwilling to see, especially the great threat of gun violence to minors.Is there any policy measures that can immediately maintain the first amendment and reduce the violence of guns?The debate between Wans and Waltz, with the unprecedented bill passed by Biden's ruling, on improving the threshold of gun ownership, indicating the consensus of the two parties in dealing with the violence of guns.On the debate, Walz immediately sympathized with the terrible gun violence incident that Walz mentioned in his own child.This response based on human nature may bring unexpected relief to Waltz and countless audiences.
If Trump and Harris's debate a month ago, what we saw was the lack of distinctive personality and fierce words, and the lack of policy analysis and explanation.Focus on policy issues that voters care about, and discuss the ruling strategies of their respective parties.In addition to many hot issues, the two candidates also showed a rare frankness to know the mistakes and mistakes.
When the host asked why he had a 180 -degree turn on Trump's evaluation, Wan Si, who was just 40 years old and had been in the federal senator for less than two years, admitted that he was wrong.Waltz was asked when the actual time to visit Hong Kong in 1989 was inconsistent with what he said, although he first flashed his words, and avoided the teachings in China how to bring him valuable experience, but in the end he had to admit himself.Remember time.
Two vice presidential candidates showing humble quality in the debate can become an important factor affecting the swing voters, I am afraid it is difficult to say now.But one point may be unexpected by many audiences. The only debate between vice presidential candidates has brought a little hope to many publicly worrieds of American political polarization.In terms of national governance, the Republican and Democratic parties have a consensus on other issues, but they are consensus on other issues, and these consensus is not only at the target level, but also on means and specific measures.Aside from the emotionalization of emotional confrontation in the two debates, it seems that the basic logic behind the two parties to compete with the heroes has not changed, that is, whoever better responds to the most concerned and urgent challenges of the current people is more likely to get it.Go to the White House.
The author is an international energy and strategic observer, a podcast host
