Viewpoint: WHO must reform but not favors China

01 Viewpoint

The number of new crown viruses in the United States reached 400,000 people. President Trump issued a post on social media on Tuesday (7th) to fire to the World Health Organization.It is even more self -proclaimed that the Chinese immigrants have not been restricted by the presence of the World Wei.Trump's remarks are not only full of problems, but also seem to completely forget the standards of H1N1 A Fluid in the United States in 2009.Sincerely, as some experts have proposed, WHO has reflected a lot of problems in dealing with the popularity, but it cannot be mentioned that it is favoring China.These problems did not occur because of this popularity, but the structural problems that have always existed.

Big American politician collective amnesia in 2009?

Some of the United States or Hong Kong criticized WHO to favors China, pointed out that WHO over -trust China, and also criticized it that it had not recommended it to China.These criticisms are somewhat reasonable, but by this, it is referred to as the WHO to favor China, but they have no understanding of WHO's consistent practices.The WHO did not investigate the real power, and there was no reason to judge before the trial was not trusted.It is not recommended to Fengguan's practice in the past many years.WHO has always had weaknesses on dealing with these issues, but it is not a differential treatment. So why is it favorable to China?

When WHO favored China, it was even more funny when he said from the American politics.In 2009, H1N1 flu was popular. American politicians have discovered the virus since April, but they have always declared that their threats are not great.American politicians have always diluted the epidemic, and did not take the means of controlling the epidemic, and let the virus spread all over the world.At that time, WHO also did not recommend excessive travel restrictions on the United States, and even American politicians felt that it was not enough. Politics such as sanctions warned other countries to warn other countries that they could not be closed against the United States.Fortunately, H1N1 broke out in 2009 that it did not cause greater casualties, but now it is said that the H1N1 virus mortality is very low. It is afterwards. Because when the H1N1 broke out in 1918, the mortality rate was deduced by nearly 10%, which also caused a large number of deaths, indicating that the virus has the virus.Extremely risk.Even if the mortality rate is not high, there are countless global epidemic infected in 2009. According to their own calculations by the US Centers for Disease Control and Prevention, about 50 million infected diseases around the world, and 150,000 to 570,000 people died.

Now that American politicians say that WHO is favored by China, of course, it is impossible for the collective amnesia to forget how to deal with when the epidemic broke out when the epidemic broke out in the United States in 2009. Instead, it collectively shirk the U.S. responsibility to respond to the failure of the United States.

WTO should reform the power

However, governments must be responsible for the outbreak of the epidemic, but it does not mean that there is no problem in responding to the epidemic.The epidemic has once again explained that the WTO has always been improved.Just as Liang Zhuowei, the dean of the National Public Health Expert, recently mentioned in academic journals that WHO has insufficient power on the mechanism of dealing with the epidemic.In terms of power, WHO is just a proposed agency and does not have the right to investigate independently. The proposal has no binding power. How to implement epidemic prevention in various countries is also preferred by countries.Under the principles of sovereignty over everything, WTO can only trust the data provided by the country provided by the outbreak of the epidemic in principle.Liang Zhuowei mentioned that WHO must have new finance and political power. For example, the authority of an independent investigation of the epidemic can improve the current problems.

In fact, the problem of insufficient power of WTO is the same as the problem of insufficient power of various world organizations.To achieve global governance, countries must take the initiative to abandon some sovereignty, but this is very challenging in the current political environment.Obviously, countries are unwilling to cooperate with their own politics.This time is the outbreak of China. The next time it may be a problem with other countries, and then another scene is performed by the scene.How the worldwide organizations such as WHO should go, depending on when people all over the world have realized the habit of picked up each other, and understand the urgency of global governance.