(Hong Kong/London/Ottawa Comprehensive News) Britain and Canada issued a Hong Kong report on the same day, questioning the restrictions of the Hong Kong National Security Law to restrict judicial justice, and triggered a refutation of the Hong Kong Special Administrative Region Government and the Ministry of Foreign Affairs of China.
The British government issued the latest Hong Kong semi -annual report on Tuesday local time (September 19). Foreign Minister Cleverly criticized China to use the National Security Law to restrict the Sino -British joint statement and many rights and freedom stipulated in the Hong Kong Basic Law and the Hong Kong Basic Law, Expand the scope of the National Security Law to the real national security issues.He believes that Hong Kong's laws and judicial systems are at the key intersection.
The Hong Kong Government responded that this report was a false speech and slanderous discreditation of Hong Kong's reshaping district council, maintaining national security, and protecting human rights.Refers to the report as the old bomb, emphasizing that the United Kingdom has no sovereignty, no governance, and supervision power to the return of Hong Kong after returning, and is telling that "any trick to trouble Hong Kong will never succeed."
On the other hand, Fraser Institute in Canada released the 2023 Report on Tuesday (September 19), which shows that Hong Kong's historic first lost its first place for the first time and was replaced by Singapore with a 0.01 points advantage.
Bloomberg pointed out that in the latest report of Fisha pointed out that Hong Kong's business costs increase, restrict foreign labor employment, damage to judicial independence confidence, and the rule of law (Milital Interference) have intensified, leading to "regulatory" and "judicial system"The scoring is declining.
The Hong Kong Government issued a press release to refute the questioning of the Fisa Research Institute in one way, reiterating that Hong Kong enjoys a high degree of autonomy, and its labor policy has not changed, and questioned the fairness of the report conclusion.
