If Southeast Asia has dissatisfaction with China's behavior or behavior, Professor Chen Qingzhu of the cruise ambassador believes that the truth should be described to the truth, but the tone can be in Asia and take into account Chinese culture.
At the second seminar of "Re -Creating Destiny: The 100th Anniversary Meeting of Mr. Li Guangyao's Birth", the host and the editor -in -chief of the South China Morning Post, Zuraidah Ibrahim, pointed out that Singapore's shortcomings of Western countries have made a positive voice, butDoes this "dual standard" do not adopt such a approach to China will benefit China ’s local influence operation.
Chen Qingzhu pointed out that the difference is because the United States advertises itself as a free and open society, so it should be happy to accept debate and criticism.Culturally, frankness points out that the problem is in line with the style of the United States, and the Asians are "able to be able to care soon."
"If Chinese behavior cannot win the favor of the people in Southern Asia, we should tell the truth. But based on Chinese culture, you can say the same thing, but your tone can be different."
She further explained, "Regardless of emotions, it is the United States. Not so, they can't care. However, in Asia, we can quickly care. So there is no need to use the same tone, but we should point outCome. "
Former Australian Prime Minister Lu Kewen believes that since China has changed its posture and wants to become a global leader, it also publicly develops the topic involving its own interests, so other countries should also respond.Private negotiations on China should also be active and consistent.
As for whether there is any reason to look at China's ambitions more kindly, Birahari, the director of the Middle East Institute, said that if a country thinks that the world order does not reach its balance, it will inevitably feel that he should have more rights.
"In the situation of the potential, there are some reasons to yearn for China ... But at the same time, if you want to have the right to speak in the formulation of rules, it is different from wanting to formulate rules unilaterally."
