The "Kiss Gate" incident in the Chinese Academy of Sciences Fang Yanning has caused heated discussions in recent days. Public opinion believes that the provisions of the relevant academicians should be strictly implemented, that is, the personal behavior of academicians violates scientific morality or misconduct, which seriously affects the reputation of the academician group.It should be advised to abandon the title of academician.

Fang Yingning, an academician of the Chinese Academy of Sciences and a professor of Beijing University of Technology (North University of Technology), recently attended a video conference. A young woman suddenly entered the camera to kiss his face continuously. Fang Yingning reminded the other party to leave the camera immediately after the video was connected.

Some netizens have picked up a postdoctoral post -doctoral of the woman, and they have a teacher -student relationship with Fang Yanning. The two sides have their own spouses.Some online public accounts posted that the woman's move showed that her relationship with Fang Yinning was significantly exceeded the category of teachers and students.

In the early morning of October 10, Beicheng issued a notice saying that the school attaches great importance to the matter and has launched the investigation as soon as possible, and is conducting the relevant situation.The relevant verification situation will be announced in a timely manner to respond to social concerns.

Academic status scientific research funds far exceed that the academician of others is difficult to exit

Public information shows that Fang Yinning was 64 years old and received a doctorate degree in Israeli Institute of Technology; from 1995 to 2009, he served as an associate professor and professor at the Department of Engineering Mechanics at Tsinghua University; from 2009 to 2015, he served as a professor of chair professor and deputy of the School of Engineering School of Engineering from 2009 to 2015.Dean; in 2013, he was elected as an academician of the Chinese Academy of Sciences; since 2015, he served as a professor at Beijing Institute of Technology; from 2015 to November 2018, he served as Deputy President of Beijing University of Technology; he was elected as a foreign academician of the National Academy of Engineering in 2022.

In China, the highest honor of scientific researchers is the academician of the Chinese Academy of Sciences and the academician of the Chinese Academy of Engineering. The academician also has the academic status and scientific research funds far beyond others. It is difficult to exit once after being elected.In recent years, some academicians have misconduct and seek improper interests, which has made the outside world a slightly word for the academician system.

Li Xiaohong, Dean of the Chinese Academy of Engineering, pointed out at the Academician Conference in 2021 that the academician team's work has achieved significant results, but some prominent problems have not been fundamentally resolved for a long time.For example, he said that the title of academician carried non -academic factors.Individual academicians are invited to participate in various activities that have nothing to do with this academic field. Unreasonable platforms and facades have occurred. Some academicians are hired by two units or multiple units.Phenomenon has repeatedly banned.

On September 6, the CPC Central Committee's Shenzhen Reform Commission reviewed and approved several opinions on deepening the reform of the academician system, emphasizing the need to improve the quality of academicians, so that the title of academician to further return to its honor and academicity.In mid -September, 22 departments including the Ministry of Science and Technology and the Central Propaganda Department issued a revised research and processing rules for scientific research dishonesty, including 13 processing measures, including the cancellation of the titles of academicians.

China News Weekly cited scholars on October 11 that the academic exit system should include three aspects: First, the selection stage of academicians, candidates are not clean and self -disciplined, running must be honored, voting, and large social controversy.Stop or persuade him to withdraw; the second is that after being elected, you can withdraw from the reputation of academicians.