Ji Yan Spring and Autumn

Wen Tiejun, a scholar who is well -known in China (agriculture, rural, rural, farmers), has recently fallen into a vortex of controversy. The concept of "people's economy" proposed has triggered a two -pole evaluation in the academic and public opinion field.Critics pointed out that he opposed reform and opening up and attempted to return to the planned economy era; supporters boasted that he voiced for vulnerable groups and did not let domestic and overseas capital do whatever he wanted.

On the occasion of the 20th National Congress of the Communist Party of China, the controversy of Wen Tiejun's point of view has risen sharply.Some people even think that Wen Tiejun's "people's economy" may have a strong backstage. It is intended to test the direction of the wind. The official may propose the "socialist people's economy" to replace the "socialist market economy" that has been used for many years.

Wen Tiejun talked about his "people's economy" view in a video interview program, mainly including autonomy, locality, comprehensiveness, and people.

Wen Tiejun said: "Autonomy is highly related to the formation and maintenance of national economic sovereignty. If this economy is not autonomous in my country, but is formed by foreign intervention, of course, it must form its income to serve overseas interests overseas benefits. Group. "

"Compared with globalization, locality has become an international trend. Global should pursue its locality, locality, including the development of resources, how to feed the benefits of this developmentLocal, let the development of resources become local sustainable, etc., autonomy and locality are related to maintaining sovereignty. "

"Enterprises are not simply the goal of pursuing the maximum of private interests, but the goal of pursuing the comprehensive development of the local area."

"Because it is the people, the people's nature has a very important characteristics of property relationships, which is the ownership of the whole people. Looking at China today, it has objectively formed a state -owned enterprise with considerable share.It still has the basic rights of the relationship between the relationship between property. How these rights are reflected in the important connotation of our first mind in mind. "

It is not difficult to see that Wen Tiejun's views are not esoteric, nor do you not have much new ideas.Moreover, this video was put on the Internet in May this year, and not many people started to care about it. In the past week, it suddenly became popular.

The popularity is because several economists with higher online popularity bombarded Wen Tiejun's "people's economy" in unison, referring to his "autonomy" is the retreat of the country;It is necessary to run the society in a large enterprise; the people's nature is to return to the old road of the first and second grandfather.

Treating the country, self -sufficiency, corporate society, the second father, etc., have all been an important feature of the economic and social before China's reform and opening up.According to critics, Wen Tiejun is obviously opposed to reform and opening up and trying to return to the planned economy era.

Some critics also pointed out that Wen Tiejun used the hat of the people's economy to apply some concepts of the planned economy and the small farmer's economy. It was slightly rough to pack a so -called new theory.A modern economic development model with a complicated interest structure and a sufficiently deeper implementation of social development, including stocks, investment, bonds, futures, limited liability companies, banks, and exchange business, all of which are based on the basic logical framework of modernization.This is not to say that a Western economic model is wrong. If it is inappropriate, it can be completely abandoned.

Wen Tiejun's approval was relatively sudden, and some even reprimanded him to "have no skills" to attack him.However, Wen Tiejun, who was over seventy years old, did not counterattack the critics, but only implied that others might have solved his meaning.

But another group of netizens did not do it, they wanted to take the lead for Wen Tiejun.They believe that Wen Tiejun's "people's economy" hopes that ordinary people will benefit from economic development, avoid polarization, and achieve common prosperity. Economists who attack Wen Tiejun are just capital spokespersons and serve interest groups.

Sima Nanya, a web celebrity that is regarded as a big V of the left, said that Professor Wen Tiejun's statement is nothing more than talking about the essential characteristics of socialism with Chinese characteristics.Improve, not to change the string more.

Sima Nan believes: "Some people have smelled something. They are afraid, particularly dislike, higher updates and generals of the essential characteristics of socialism with Chinese characteristics, that is, people's expression."The "maximum private interests' economic phenomenon formed in some areas of some areas, the phenomenon of brutal growth in capital is normal, is sacred, for inviolability, and defend it clearly."

The controversy of the "people's economy" seems to rise to the height of two different development paths.On the eve of the 20th National Congress of the Communist Party of China, this argument will inevitably cause the outside world to imagine: Could the conference really change the string more and give up the "socialist market economy"?

In fact, although Wen Tiejun is well -known, it is not the official mainstream economist, and his "people's economy" is not systematic and strict.To say that there is a powerful background behind him, and even the heavy responsibility of "trying the wind and testing the water", I am afraid that the role and influence of Wen Tiejun and its "people's economy" view.

"Establishing a socialist market economy system" is the official economic reform goal of the 14th National Congress of the Communist Party of China in 1992. In the past 30 years, it has played a huge role in the rapid development of the Chinese economy.In 2013, the Third Plenary Session of the Eighteenth Central Committee of the Communist Party of China further proposed that "the market played a decisive role in the allocation of resources", and in 2017, the 19th National Congress of the Communist Party of China reiterated this direction.

It is difficult to imagine that the official will use the concept of "people's economy" to replace the effective market economy theory for many years.This "people's economy" dispute is nothing more than netizens who have different stances.This has been commonplace on the Chinese public opinion field.