The former director of the Traffic Management Bureau of the Guizhou Provincial Public Security Department, Shi Long March, has been bribery, corruption, and illegal holding of ammunition cases.369 rounds of ammunition.

According to the WeChat public account of the "Tongren Court", the Tongren City Intermediate People's Court of Guizhou Province opened the trial on Friday (June 28) and tried the former party secretary and director of the Transportation Management Bureau of the Guizhou Provincial Public Security Department.Bringing, corruption, and illegal holding of ammunition.

The People's Procuratorate of Tongren City accused that from 1996 to 2023, Shi Long March used the political commissar of the Division of the Transportation Police Corps of the Guizhou Provincial Public Security Department, and the Guizhou Provincial Public Security Department Traffic Management Bureau (the Guizhou Provincial Public Security Department Transportation Police Corps)The deputy director, deputy chief captain, director, captain, deputy secretary of the party committee, secretary, and other positions are convenient to help relevant personnel in terms of corporate contracting and project bidding.10,000 yuan did not actually get it.During the period, Shi Long March took advantage of the convenience of the position to swallow more than 50,000 yuan in public property. At the same time, it violated the management regulations of guns and ammunition, and 369 ammunition was collected.

The procuratorial organs requested the criminal liability of Shi Long March for bribery, corruption, and illegal holding of ammunition.

During the trial, the procuratorial organs presented relevant evidence, and the Long March and their defender conducted a cross -examination certificate. The two parties of the prosecution expressed their opinions under the auspices of the court.The case will be pronounced.

Shi Long March was investigated last August and was expelled from the Communist Party of China in January this year.At that time, the notification pointed out that he was doing superstitious activities, using his position to facilitate illegal possession of public property, and the amount was large; he used his job convenience to seek benefits for the contracting enterprises and project bidding for others.