(Washington Composite Electric) The United States Ambassador to China, Burns, said that the United States restricting trade with technology in China is a limited and common sense measures adopted to protect national interests. At the time of competition between the two countries, the United States has no reason to assist China to assist China.Improve military strength.He reiterated that the United States did not seek decoupling with China and stated that the United States was ready to have a high -level dialogue with China.

Bernus attended the online symposium at the Statthary Center of Washington think tank on Tuesday (May 2nd), "We did not want to separate the two economies of China and the United States, but we adopted in some areas.Measures to protect national security interests and continue to do so. "

He as an exampleIt is pointed out that these semiconductor "may strengthen the strength of the Chinese army and intelligence community, and considering that we are in major competition with China, the United States does not make sense."

Bernus's statement has strengthened the information transmitted by senior US officials in recent weeks, that is, the Bayeng government sought "removing risks" instead of "decoupling" in the Sino -US economic relations.

He said: "Our investment in the two -way trade between China and the United States is increasing, not decrease. But in some advanced technology fields, we are preparing or announced some restrictions, because this obviously meets the national interests of the United States." Bernus described that Sino -US relations are complex and competitive, but "we don't seek conflict with China. We don't want to return to the Cold War state with China. We need to make this relationship more stable."

He also mentioned that there are currently about 295,000 Chinese students studying in the United States, but there are only 350 American students in China."China -US society has been decoupled in the past three years. This is unhealthy and not wise."

Bernus: The United States is ready to have a high -level talks with China

Bernus also stated that the United States has prepared to have a high -level talks with China and hope that the two parties will establish better communication channels."Our opinion is that the two governments of the two countries must establish a better communication channel for communication. When we encounter big problems and major differences, this is especially important. We will never avoid discussions.We are doing each other. "

This is the clearest signal that the United States has released a widespread dialogue with China so far.Since the suspected

In response to the Taiwan issue, Bernes reiterated that the United States still pursues the "one China" policy, but emphasized that cross -strait differences must be resolved in a peaceful way.

I was asked about In order to be peaceful or expanding influence, Berns said that it remains to be observed.He pointed out that China ’s official talk with President of Ukraine a few days ago is a good start, but" we want to see what will happen next. "

Bernus also mentioned whether China provided fatal military assistance to Russia is a core issue in Sino -US relations.

Experts believe that the key to whether high -level contact between China and the United States can recover lies in China's attitude.Wang Weizheng, dean of the School of Arts and Sciences at the University of Edfei University, pointed out in an interview with Radio Free Asia that China has no great interest in recovering high -level high -level high -level in the United States, because Beijing believes that some things that happened in the past have not yet resolved, such as balloon incidents.

Cooper, an Asian strategic expert at the American Institute of Enterprise, believes that US -China relations may indeed not make breakthroughs in the short term, because the fundamental interests of the two countries are different.He said that China does not think it is necessary to talk to the United States, and contact with the United States may not make any breakthroughs.