A procedure reversal in the Beijing Huacheng case that Taiwan was involved in the Beijing Citizen Chairman Ke Wenzhe was reversed. The Taipei District Court believed that the prosecutor's proof could not prove that .Ke Wenzhe's suspicion of criminal criminals , on Monday (September 2), it was ruled that Ke Wenzhe left himself without paying insurance money.
When Ke Wenzhe stepped out of the court on the same day, he accused the Taipei Procuratorate of the Procuratorate of the Taipei. He seized mobile phones, hard disks, fabricated stories, and "oppressed himself and abuse"; he also affirmed the pressure of the judge to carry all the pressure.The Taipei Prosecutor's Office of the Procuratorate of the Procuratorate refused to accept the court and stated that he would propose a protest.
Ke Wenzhe was accused of Tuli in the reconstruction case of Jinghua City. At noon on Friday (August 30), the Taipei Procuratorate and the Independent Department were brought back to the question.At 3 am on Monday, Ke Wenzhe asked for no guarantee.
If no guarantee, please refer to the prosecutor or the court to question the defendant, and believes that the possibility of the defendant's flee and hiding court is low. If the defendant is not required to pay the guarantee, the defendant is allowed to leave after the interrogation.Essence
Please return without guarantee is not equal to innocence
After three days and three nights of investigations and trials, Ke Wenzhe temporarily won the first round of victory, but it is not equivalent to innocence without guarantee.
Zheng Wencan, the former deputy dean of the Executive Yuan, who was also prosecuted for corruption, was detained at the third trial.In addition to the Beijing -Chinese City case, Ke Wenzhe also faces the false case of the political donation of the election. It is not easy to get out of the "double pinch".
The new head shell also reported that when former Taiwan President Chen Shui -bian, who had been in prison, talked about Ke Wenzhe's case without any warranty in an interview, said, "Don't forget that I did not guarantee it twice 16 years ago."
Ke Wenzhe and former deputy mayor of Taipei City Peng Zhensheng were requested to be detained by the Taipei Procuratorate's crime of littering and bribery for the crime of crime and bribery by the Taipei Procuratorate.Ke Wenzhe was asked to return, and Peng Zhensheng was detained.
The court pointed out that the key to this case lies in whether Ke Wenzhe knows that the Urban Planning Commission will Tuli Jinghua City in a form of illegal resolution and whether to know 20%of the volume award illegal.
The court believes that Ke Wenzhe is not a member of the metropolitan committee, and cannot directly understand the content of the meeting. He has no related majors, but is the resolution of the trust committee and the opinions of Peng Zhensheng.However, Peng Zhensheng is the chairman of the Metropolitan Committee and has a stringing certificate. In addition, Shao Yan, the executive secretary of the Metropolitan Committee of the Taipei Municipal Development Bureau and the executive secretary of the Metropolitan Committee, has the motivation of the crime and fled.Essence
After the news of Ke Wenzhe had no guarantee, the supporters of Ke Wenzhe, who were waiting outside the court for three days and three nights outside the court, cheered and kept shouting "Ke P".When Ke Wenzhe walked out of the Taipei District Court, his wife Chen Peiqi stepped forward and wept.
Ke Wenzhe told the supporters that he told the judge in the last defense that the plot ratio of Jinghua City has increased sharply. After sending public exhibitions that year, he did not ask at all, so he did not know the 840%plot ratio at all.; March and April this year, the media began to report the matter, and he only knew for the first time that all evidences did not show that he had intervention.
Jinghua City is a shopping mall located in the city of Taipei. While Ke Wenzhe served as the mayor of Taipei, the plot ratio of Jinghua City was allowed to significantly increase from 560%to 840%.
In the municipal general inquiry in 2021, Miao Boya, a member of Taipei City, reminded Ke Wenzhe's high -capacity accumulation ratio to become one of his five major cases after his departure.The additional area obtained is considered as a market price, about 1 billion yuan (NT $ 43 million).
The court ruled that after Ke Wenzhe had no guarantee, Huang Guochang, the general party of the People's Party Legislative Yuan, questioned, who has instructed the political pursuit of Ke Wenzhe's crime and deserted board?Wu Siyao, the Democratic Party of the Democratic Progressive Party Legislative Yuan, accused Huang Guochang and others accusing Huang Guochang encouraging populism and pressureing judicial justice.
On the other hand, Shao Yan, who was accused of the motivation of the crime and fled, returned to Taiwan last Sunday.The Taipei District Procuratorate conducted a search for Shao Yan's residence on Monday on Monday, and the defendant was brought back to the defendant as the crime of corruption and guilty regulations.
