Source: Hong Kong 01
Written article: Zheng Rui
On February 19, the US Democratic Primary Election home came to Las Vegas, Nevada. Candidates began the third debate of the party.This debate is extremely fierce. Even if candidates have been embarrassed each other before, the density and strength of the candidates' attacks and derogation have exceeded the past.
As the outside world expected, the former New York Mayor Mike Bloomberg, who was standing on the TV debate, became the target of the Democratic Party ’s melee.
Since he announced the election, several other Democratic candidates have questioned his billionaire's identity. At present, Bernie Sanders, the leading votes, and Elizabeth Warren, the same left -wing candidate,He criticized him to buy the debate voucher with money, while former vice president Joe Biden expressed dissatisfaction with Bloomberg's use of former President Barack Obama.The really wonderful one is still on the debate.
Bloomberg was cheapped by Trump
As soon as the debate started, everyone had pointed the direction of the attack on the target heart.Wallen's opening is the opponent I want to talk about campaign. One of the billionaires called LSquo; fat women RSquo; (Fat Broads) and LSquo; Horse-Faced Lesbians.I am not referring to Trump, I mean Mayor Bloomberg.
Starting from Bloomberg, Democrats have been comparing him with Trump.This debate was regarded by the outside world as a confrontation with billionaires, so candidates really regarded it as an opportunity to defeat Bloomberg and tried to prove to voters to defeat Trump.
Senator Amy Kloubuchar ironically said that I welcomed Bloomberg to the debate, so he could not continue to hide behind his campaign advertisement.Sanders violently criticized his rich identity, saying that you know that your wealth was not created by you.Bombard Bombage Bloomberg's negative views of the Affordable Care Act (often known as Obama Medical Reform).Although the party representative ticket temporarily leads Pete Buttigeig, although the firepower is aligned with multiple people, he emphasizes the values of the Democrats, reminding voters to run for not just money, and call on us to be elected a real Democratic party.It also hit Bloomberg.
One of the biggest climax in the debate is that Warren's deadly biting the allegations of Bloomberg's sexual harassment, and even asked him to express themselves in public.After rejecting this proposal, the audience was uproar.
The debate of this commentator called the actual version of the survivor movie should be Bloomberg first. However, defeating him really means to defeat Trump?
Love and hate between money and politicians
It is undeniable that Bloomberg, as a billionaire, emphasizes that he has reference to Trump in terms of campaign strategy.As the rich in New York, Bloomberg also has many scandals, sexual assault, gender discrimination, and obvious racial discrimination on the Stop-And-Frisk operation during the mayor of the mayor.combine.
However, after all, Bloomberg was not Trump, and Budorigg also said a few days ago that his behavior could not be compared with Trump.All his original sin is still the identity of his billionaire, and his ability to affect politics over the years.With this image, any behavior stain can be put infinitely.This is why it is why civilians compare wealth, but after the stage of political campaign, all candidates are rushing to be more poorer than anyone else, accusing each other with several real estate and how much income.
However, in reality, even if none of the presidential elections come from the rich class, money politics is still the existence of the US election.Whether it is TV debate, campaign publicity or political support, money is always the candidate to knock on the stepping tiles in the next step. One of the most concerned issues for each election is the ability to attract fundraising.Being able to stand on the debate platform, no matter what the political opinion, no one can say that his campaign has no support of rich people. In other words, billionaires are not standing on the stage, and they are also standing behind the candidate.
As Bloomberg said, I did make a lot of money, donated a lot of money, and a large part of it was given to the Democratic Party.This is undoubtedly a reminder of mdash; mdash; even if he is not on the stage, money politics is still everywhere.A source said that when Bloomberg visited the Democratic Party as a candidate for support, members of the members introduced themselves to strive for his future care.Isn't it a ironic?
It should not be forgotten that Trump's election in 2016 is to use people's almost disgusting politics, or even desperate.People would rather believe that Trump did not need corruption subtext because I was wealthy, and did not want to follow other candidates with more political experience.Although this does not mean that Bloomberg's campaign will be the same as Trump, at least it shows that the Democratic Party compares Bloomberg as Trump within the party. In addition to creating an enemy, it cannot really defeat money in politics in politics.The status.
The political reality behind Trump symbols
At this point, the Democratic Party has vowed to defeat Trump and go to the debate to create another Trump to prove the point where he can defeat him.Was Bloomberg another other Trump or the Democratic Party defeated him because of his performance in the debate? Nothing can actually mean whose victory or failure.The Democratic Party and even the American society are facing the same political reality as 2016, even more severe than 4 years ago.
Democratic Election Preheat: Can Bloomberg live up later
Four years ago, Trump's victory benefited from the polarized political orientation of the United States, the loopholes of the election system, and the public opinion environment that was abducted by conflicts and hate.Although Democrats are talking about political issues today, the efforts behind them are used to study how to attack their opponents and defeat their opponents.It exaggerates Bloomberg's stains, creating another Trump's target, and creating more enemy and self -conflict is also an inevitable choice in the same reality.
After four years of elections, Trump is no longer just a phenomenon, but has become a symbol. This symbol is more and more personal.changed.Unfortunately, from the current situation, it seems that this symbol will affect US politics for a long time.
