The ＂diagnosis after death＂ marked Taiwans epidemic prevention omissions

United Daily News Agency

After seven consecutive days, no new cases of new crown pneumonia were found, the Taiwan Central Epidemium Command Center announced two confirmed cases; unfortunately, one of the patients had died of illness the day before.There is no need to worry too much about the first death case in Taiwan. After all, the mortality rate of new crown pneumonia is only 2%.It is wrong to be that the patient was not included in the diagnosis list before his death, but was confirmed after death.This shows that in Taiwan, some potential patients may be ignored when they advertise their diagnostic numbers.

The reason why the diagnosis after death was mainly because this case did not have any history of tourism in Lu, Hong Kong and Macao. Therefore, although pneumonia was hospitalized at the beginning of the month, the hospital notification standards were still not reported in accordance with the period of epidemic prevention at the time.Until the 12th of this month, Chen Shizhong, commander of the central epidemic, referred to the United States and Singapore's practice to expand the beads of severe cases of influenza in influenza; four days later, the patient was announced as a diagnosis of infection, but the day before he wasAlready died.Unfortunately, he had transmitted the virus to the same brothers.

This wave of epidemic is the most suspicious feature that the virus latency period is two weeks or even longer. Some patients have extremely obvious symptoms, and they have the ability to infect them during the asymptomatic stage, which makes it difficult to track the new crown pneumonia and be invincible.However, this situation is not uncommon. After returning from Wuhan to the first charter of Wuhan at the end of last month, Japan found three infected people. Two of them did not have any symptoms, but they were diagnosed in the infection in the fast screen.In addition, the tenth patients who have been recovered at present were unknowingly transmitted to his wife during mildness; his wife was diagnosed before he was tracked.To this end, the newspaper's asymptomatic infection must be blocked on February 1st, that is, early calling on the government to improve the standards of epidemic control to prevent plugging.However, it still happens that the government is insufficient.

The 19th patient who was diagnosed after death was a white -brand taxi driver. Sometimes Taiwanese businessmen on both sides of the strait may be infected.Now, there are two directions for the government to follow up: one is to trace the source to find his source of infection; the other is to pursue it down. During the incubation period and hospitalization period, whether he spread the virus to other relatives or medical staff around him.The results of these two tracks will be an important indicator of whether Taiwan has appeared in community infection.

In the tracking part of the medical staff, the situation may be relatively simple.Since Taiwan announced the entry quarantine in the end of last month, the staff of various medical institutions in Taiwan have worn on a mask and waited. Although the 19th patient was not diagnosed with new crown pneumonia when the medical treatment was confirmed, he was transmitted to the medical staff.The probability of medical staff is low.The question is that if he has a cough and fever symptoms and has not been diagnosed with pneumonia, whether a public is infected in the hospital or other places, he must be tracked in detail.

As for the part of the source of its infection, it may be difficult.At present, the Epidemic Prevention Center has a record from the deceased's mobile phone to the mobile phone, and the three Taiwanese businessmen he may have contacted are investigating.However, it has been 20 days since the deceased had a fever for the first time. Even if some of the three Taiwanese businessmen were found to be the source of infection. In the past 20 days, this person may have been infected with relatives and friends and even passersby.If this is the case, the situation will be complicated and unimaginable in the community infection.However, even the worst situation happened, the government still had to be patient to trace the cocoon one by one. Only in this way can the virus completely expel the virus and avoid the regrets such as the Heping Hospital sealing hospital during the SARS period.

The 19th case was not announced until the death. From any perspective, it was a embarrassing omissions in Taiwan's strict epidemic prevention work.In particular, when the government has repeatedly promoted how Taiwan's epidemic prevention work was done, Su Yan boasted that the real -name system of the mask was the most successful in the world. In fact, this attitude was trying to lower the diagnosis number.Wishes.On the 12th, the CDC notified the traceable test of more than a hundred suspicious influenza, which was a very correct approach. The result was found that the 19th case was the only diagnosis, and he immediately moved him to the negative pressure ward.But the question is, why did the command center announce the case immediately that day, but did not send the confirmation until the next day after his death?

It is indeed the best strategy to deal with the width and the enemy's strictness.Once the community infection has occurred, the epidemic prevention center may disclose the scope of the activity of the dead diagnosis, which is a choice.