01 Viewpoint

At the UN Security Council on Tuesday (10th), the Palestinian Autonomous Government Chairman, not only criticizing the legitimacy of the Middle East Peace Plan proposed by the United States, but also describing the land like Swiss cheese.Conclusion to reject Israel MDASH; a tough position in the US proposal.

Although Abbas's standpoint has been supported by the three multinational organizations of the National Alliance, Islamic Cooperation Organization and the African Union, in addition to the interests of the hearts of various countries, in addition to expecting the attention of the international community, the Pakistan can only rely on the weakness to rely on weakness.Power resistance.

Trump claims to be the Century Agreement in the Middle East, but the provisions in the inside are more harsh than the OSLO Accord in 1993.EssenceFirst of all, the Century Agreement supports Israel's land that can be robbed back to the settlement policy and set up a flying community, which is legalized to make the current colonial policy.Secondly, in the sovereignty disputes in Jerusalem, Trump not only shamelessly suggested that Palestine set up a capital in the ABU DIS of the East Jerusalem, but also denied that the refugees who were out of their discharge due to the war should have the right to return to their hometown (Right ofReturn).In addition, the agreement ignores military and security control of normal countries, and the measures to seal the city with military controls are constant, leaving only civil administration to Palestine.These terms are not only far from the harsh Oslo Agreement, but also violation of the Security Association No. 242 decision to require Israel to return to the land that is illegally invaded in the 1967 war.

Although Trump seems to be actively mediation, from recent years, from the movement of the U.S. Embassy in Jerusalem in recent years, stopping opposition to the settlement policy, and acknowledging the sovereignty of Tel Aviv at the Gelan Highlands, the US position has long been in neutrality.If unveiled.However, in history, the Arab country standing on the same front as Palestine is also different from the United States.

Arab countries are not depending on

Although Abbas's speech has endorsed three multinational organizations, the performance of the members of the organization's private interaction with Israel and the United States has long been away from the traditional position of the Arab countries.When Trump announced the Century Agreement in the White House last month, the attendees not only include Israeli Prime Minister Neitanahu, but also the ambassadors of Barin, the UAE and Amman to become the White House.In particular, Saudi Arabia and the UAE even publicly thanked Trump for their efforts to call on Israel and Palestine for a direct conversation.In addition, Egypt, which has been fighting in Israel in the past, only shows that it will carefully and thoroughly review the vision of the United States, and stay completely away from the conclusion that there should be a position.

A group of Arab countries abandon the position of the last century and gradually move closer to the United States and Israel. There are two major reasons that cannot be ignored.After several Middle East War in the last century, the United States adopted a division of the Arab countries, and has successfully seduced many countries to become the puppet of Washington.For example, in the Middle East countries such as Jordan and Egypt, under the mistakes of governance, society has been fragmented and polarized for many years, so that it must rely on the assistance provided by the United States to maintain its political power.Economic and military assistance of more than $ 1.6 billion can only obey its foreign policy.Furthermore, the enemy's enemy is the utilitarian calculation of friends. In recent years, the conflict between the United States and Iran has risen, and the Bay countries such as Saudi Arabia, the UAE, and Barin have abandoned Palestinian, and they are in color to embrace.

Even though the Palestinian people are far more severe than the ethnic isolation period in South Africa in the last century. Not only did it have no chips to negotiate with Israel, but in recent years, they have been abandoned by the Arab countries.In 2005, the British organization proposed a global folk political movement, all of which to pressure Israel through resistance, withdrawal of capital and sanctions (BDS), forcing the authorities to stop occupying Palestine, respect the equal rights of all ethnic groups, and implement the Palestinian refugees'Return to hometown.Even though the victim of the BDS is the national people of Israel and the officials who are not a racial isolation policy, the potential losses are limited to the economic level when they are unique.Terrorist attacks are peaceful and rational.In addition to accepting humiliated isolation policies, the moment the chinist also has the power of only BDS to speak for them.