Author: Shao Zonghai

As the 2020 Taiwan election election is moving towards the hotness, the Kuomintang suddenly issued a statement late at night on December 24, which reiterated the principles of the Kuomintang's cross -strait relations was the 1992 consensus, the various tables in the first China, and the opposition to Taiwan independence.

The red skills have to be guarded

The reason why it triggered the stance is mainly to refer to Sanli TV's political theory program, deliberately erase redness and disintegrate the standpoint of the Kuomintang, so it is necessary to explain it again.The statement also said that this principle has long been stated in the party's platform and has never changed.Now that it has been stated in the party's platform and has never changed, it has been said that the Cross -Strait position of the Kuomintang has always been -unnecessary, and there is no need to clarify a lot of reds for a TV station's political theory program.

Although this approach is to present the red techniques of this election, the two have to be guarded, but on the other hand, it also shows that the Kuomintang's fragile defense.In one step, only confession and clarification of the outside of redness.

However, it is worthy of the Kuomintang's self -introspection. It is in the text of the Kuomintang's statement on December 24. When the principle of reiterating its cross -strait relations is the 1992 consensus, the one -China table, and the opposition to Taiwan independence.It is clearly listed in the party's platform.It is particularly interesting that in the statement of the statement, the principles of the 1992 consensus and the principles of each of the one in the first China are quoted, but the principle of opposing Taiwan independence and not accepting the one country, two systems is not added.It also emphasized that this principle has long been stated in the party's platform and has never changed.

As for this principle that this principle has long been stated in the party's platform, this passage has never been changed.Or should we also cover Taiwan independence and not accept one country, two systems?Maybe this is also when the Kuomintang reiterated the principle of cross -strait relations. It is necessary to allow the people of Taiwan to support the Kuomintang, which can better understand whether the direction of this party is in line with their expectations.

In response to the principles of the 1992 consensus and the one -China table, in the party platform policy program revised by the Kuomintang on August 20, 2017, it was mentioned that since the party returned to ruling in 2008, Ma Ying -jeou's 8 -year main administration period was in the period.Under the Constitution structure of the Republic of China, maintaining the status quo of non -unified, uniqueness, and martial arts, and on the basis of lsquo; 92 consensus, each of the one -China table RSQUO;, Expand the communication level.

However, in response to opposition to Taiwan independence, not accepting one country, two systems, the policy program only mentioned that the party resolutely opposed the words of Taiwan independence, and did not say that they did not accept one country, two systems. This may be the reason why the Kuomintang did not use quotes on the 24th statement.

Since it is the principle of reiterating the relationship between the Kuomintang's cross -strait relationship before election, when the position of one country, two systems is not accepted, it is exactly the current party chairman Wu Dunyi and the political position of the party's candidate Han Yu.Careful thinking.

There is no clear -scale policy on the policy program. For example, if you do not accept the one country, two systems, do you not have to be clearly included in the party's outline, and mix it in an important statement or document of the party to avoid unnecessary confusion.

Should adhere to the position of the party outline

In fact, when the Kuomintang held the 19th Plenary Session on September 4, 2016, he passed the new party outlined decision and confirmed that the peace agreement was included in part of the party platform.There are various tables in the first middle school, and the tables in the first middle school only appear in the general theory of peace and political platform, which has caused different opinions in the Kuomintang.At that time, the deputy Wu Dunyi had responded that the 1992 consensus must be united with the various tables in the first middle school, and Zhu Lilun, who was also the Kuomintang campaign, also believed that when he attended the plenary session, he also believed that the 92 Consensus One Middle School was the foundation.The revelation that caused the controversy to us is that the Kuomintang has always attached great importance to what the documents said, and it should be consistent with the position on the party platform.

(The author is Honorary Professor of Macau Institute of Technology)