Former Huawei employee Li Hongyuan was detained for 251 days of public opinion storms, which have become gentle in the past few days, but the damage caused by the image caused by the storm may be difficult to recover in the short term.
The high -level market -oriented media such as the Beijing News and Surging News disclosed that Li Hongyuan was detained by the Shenzhen Public Security Bureau for 251 days for 251 days on the 2nd of this month, causing public opinion uproar.This day coincides with the anniversary of the detaing of Huawei Vice Chairman Meng Wanzhou. Meng Wanzhou published an article thanked the public for their support.However, the questioning of Huawei's question about Huawei completely crushed the public opinion of the Meng Wanzhou incident.
There is no doubt that Huawei has been in a sudden public relations crisis.Earlier, although the Meng Wanzhou incident and the United States' strong suppression of Huawei made Huawei's overseas situation difficult, Huawei stood firmly on a moral high ground in China and was treated by national heroes.With the strong backing of the Chinese market, even if Huawei has a difficult step in the international market, its survival and development still have reliable support.
However, the Li Hongyuan incident severely hit the Chinese people's trust and support for Huawei.At this time, Huawei's explanation of the Li Hongyuan incident was particularly important.Although Huawei responded quickly to the Li Hongyuan incident, there was no need to explain what the public wanted to see. It was just that the company’s legal department emphasized that the Li Hongyuan incident was not a labor dispute. Huawei had the right and obligations.The judicial organs reported and supported Li Hongyuan to sue Huawei to reflect the spirit of the rule of law in front of the law.
Huawei means that it is not responsible for Li Hongyuan's detention of 251 days.Legally, this response is not wrong.Although the judicial organs judged that Li Hongyuan was not guilty, it did not judge that Huawei was suspected of crime. Li Hongyuan did not sue Huawei for accusation.
In all fairness, Huawei is just a company, not a judicial organs. It has the right to report to the Public Prosecution Law, but there is no power to determine whether the reporter is guilty.This power can only belong to the Public Prosecutor's Law.
However, Huawei is not an ordinary company.Especially in the context of fighting external suppression and obtaining strong support of the Chinese people, Huawei has been deeply bundled with the public authority.In the eyes of many people, Huawei's image even represents the image of the country.
Therefore, although Huawei has no direct relationship with Li Hongyuan's detaing for 251 days, it is reasonable to cut off the connection with the Li Hongyuan incident.This is not only because Huawei has reported Li Hongyuan, but Li Hongyuan was convicted, but also because the public did not want to see the company that had trusted and supported a company that faced a bad prison so unpopular.
What is puzzling is that in the face of turbulent doubts and accusations, why did Huawei only keep the cold legal department in front?Why can't we seek a better balance between law and reason?Huawei's strong public relations ability has gone there?
Some people speculate that Huawei's indifferent handling techniques and Li Hongyuan did not sue Huawei to explain that the incident may have other hidden feelings, and even the possibility of plot reversal.This speculation may be established, but in any case, Huawei's image is an indisputable fact due to the severe damage to the Li Hongyuan incident.If Huawei's attitude of this matter is closer to the nature of the public sympathy for the weak, it may not be hurt so much.
In the past few days, the negative comments on Huawei in the China Internet Public Opinion Farm have decreased significantly. Some public opinion began to suspect that the Li Hongyuan incident was amplified by the excitement of unique forces to cooperate with Western countries' suppression of Huawei.The change in the wind direction of public opinion may be the result of the involvement of the relevant aspects. This change can help Huawei reduce the pressure on the bright side, but it may not allow Huawei to fully get out of the predicament of public opinion.
Peng Bo, deputy director of the China National Internet Information Office, recently summarized the ten -point inspiration of Huawei's negative public opinion, including: public opinion can sought you up with you as a national hero, or you can step on your feet, and it is likely to be the same group of people; sympathyThe weak, does not meet the spirit of the rule of law, the strong also has legal rights and interests. The truth may not be in the hands of the weak, but sympathy for the weak is in line with the laws of public opinion.Wan Ma Qi; no matter who you are, you must always be awesome of the Internet, netizens, and public opinion; no matter how big it is, don't be arrogant, don't be willful.
These revelations are very profound and are also very in place for Huawei.Whether Huawei can make his image stop falling as soon as possible depends on whether it can learn from the Li Hongyuan incident and make real improvements from the Li Hongyuan incident.
